GTSpartan said:I completely agree, I just don't think the gross underrating will happen this time around. I also question the validity of the 15% driveline loss that everyone seems to automatically use. The vettes tranny may be less and it's hp figures cold be right on. If we split the difference and go with 455rwhp and figure in a 12% loss, you would get 517fwhp, which is ~2% from advertised and well within the allowable variance for the SAE method.
Hell, eveyone thought that the GT was putting out around 625-650 actual HP, but it turned out the driveline loss was much less with the rear transaxle and the motors really only puts out ~575fwhp.
Like the last cobras which dynoed anywhere form 350's to 390's, I just don't see that large of a fluctuation with the new SAE method. Obviously, chassis dynoes are terrible at measuring actual engine output so that may be the main cause for the massive variances.
If these new GT500's put down 470rw, like some insist, that would make them a conservative 535fwhp and I'm just having a hard time believing it will be that much with the new cetification process being used.
Hissman's/your predictions/inside info have been pretty much right on all along, so I tend to believe everything you say.
We are just going to have to wait and find out :thumbsup:
I hear you regarding the driveline loss figure, that variable could play a major role in this. I'm not saying 470rw for the GT500 at this point, but 460 isn't out of the realm of possibility.