Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Foo Fighters > Nirvana. Discuss.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ampstang" data-source="post: 5513137" data-attributes="member: 18394"><p>Nirvana made WAY more of an impact in the music scene around the world than the Foo Fighters did. I was once a huge fan of Nirvana, but now I'm not. I think the Foo Fighters had some catchy pop songs, but that's about it. Nirvana was a beast that in part, ended the hair-band scene. The Foo Fighters were just another top hits pop band. That's all. After my sense of good music matured, I know longer liked either bands. Not enough musicianship. Just catchy phrases. I now prefer bands that offer more than re-packaged melody or beat. Not that Nirvana re-packaged anything. It was all pretty much original, but I like to hear people that are actually good at the instruments they play.</p><p></p><p>But all in all, Nirvana was a better band, it that they shaped a genre.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ampstang, post: 5513137, member: 18394"] Nirvana made WAY more of an impact in the music scene around the world than the Foo Fighters did. I was once a huge fan of Nirvana, but now I'm not. I think the Foo Fighters had some catchy pop songs, but that's about it. Nirvana was a beast that in part, ended the hair-band scene. The Foo Fighters were just another top hits pop band. That's all. After my sense of good music matured, I know longer liked either bands. Not enough musicianship. Just catchy phrases. I now prefer bands that offer more than re-packaged melody or beat. Not that Nirvana re-packaged anything. It was all pretty much original, but I like to hear people that are actually good at the instruments they play. But all in all, Nirvana was a better band, it that they shaped a genre. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Foo Fighters > Nirvana. Discuss.
Top