Firmly Planted: Camaro ZL1 Designed for Downforce & Phase Four Video

MisterChrome

New Member
Established Member
Joined
May 23, 2007
Messages
826
Location
CA
DETROIT – With supercar levels of performance and technology, the 580-horsepower (432-kW) Camaro ZL1 can reach 170 mph (273 km/h) on the famed Nürburgring’s Nordschleife course in Germany. To maintain stability and steering response at that speed, the ZL1 features an aerodynamic design that generates downforce to press the tires against the track.

“The Camaro ZL1 lapped the Nürburgring in an incredible 7:41.27 seconds, which would not have been possible without work of our aerodynamics team,” said Al Oppenheiser, Camaro chief engineer. “The design of the ZL1 creates downforce like a race car, harnessing air pressure to press the tires against the track for extra grip and control at high speeds.”

Most production cars are designed with some lift at speed slip through the air for improved fuel economy. The Camaro LS and Camaro SS are no exceptions, enabling the Camaro LS to deliver 323 horsepower (241 kW) and up to 30 mpg on the highway.

Design for high-speed track capability takes in other considerations.

For the ZL1 – the fastest Camaro ever – the aerodynamics team set out to generate downforce for improved handing at speed while minimizing the amount of increased drag that could reduce fuel economy and the vehicle’s top speed. With the computer-assisted design recommendations, engineers tested full-scale clay models and full-size prototypes in the General Motors’ wind tunnel – shaping clay and trimming foam board by hand to affect changes and measure them immediately.

Outside of the aerodynamics laboratory, engineers tested the ZL1’s aero aids on GM’s Milford Road Course, other race tracks and the unique “rolling road” wind tunnel at the Auto Research Center in Indianapolis.

When the dust settled and the wind-tunnel blades came to a stop, the Camaro ZL1 produced 65 pounds of downforce at an equivalent 150 mph (241 km/h) – compared to 200 pounds of lift in a Camaro SS – which was offset by an increase of only 40 counts of additional aerodynamic drag.

“From the driver’s seat, the added downforce makes a huge change in the feel, and responsiveness of the ZL1 at high speeds,” said Oppenheiser. “One of the best examples of how aerodynamics improved the performance of the ZL1 is the ‘****sröhre,’ or Foxhole at the Nürburgring. In the ZL1, you can take that sweeping left-hand corner flat-out in fifth gear – nearly 160 mph (257 km/h). That’s a great testament to the confidence-inspiring stability and control the aerodynamic design helps give the Camaro ZL1.”

Seven elements contribute to the downforce of the ZL1:

1. Front fascia – The front fascia channels air for engine and brake cooling. The lower opening is larger than in a Camaro SS, providing greater airflow to the engine’s intercooler heat exchanger. Even the grille “fins” were shaped for optimal airflow. The corners of the front fascia, too, were reshaped to minimize lift, while the brake-cooling ducts in the outer corners of the lower grille opening provide a direct, high-flow path to the brake rotors. Cooling the brakes helps extend their life, particularly n the race track.

2. Hood – The ZL1’s hood has a vented, carbon fiber insert, contributing to both engine cooling and aerodynamic downforce. With traditional sealed hoods, air trapped in the engine bay creates lift at the front axle. With the ZL1, the specially shaped vents draw air up through the engine bay – allowing a significant volume of air flow while keeping the front tires firmly connected to the pavement.

3. Front splitter – Instead of a traditional front air dam, the ZL1 incorporates a racing-style splitter to help create downforce. Unlike some competitors’ vehicles that come with an add-on splitter, the ZL1’s does not have to be installed at the track – it is installed at the factory, and is designed with enough ground clearance for all driving conditions.

4. Front tire deflectors – The deflectors push airflow around the rotating wheels and tires more efficiently, reducing lift and drag. And by using deflectors in place of a traditional air dam, the downforce is less sensitive to pitch changes, making the ZL1 feel more stable at high speeds.

5. Belly pans – The ZL1 has two of them: one beneath the engine cradle and one at the rear of the engine assembly, just in front of the transmission. Both extend the width of the chassis out to the wheelhouse opening, to minimize airflow turbulence under the car. NACA-style ducts are incorporated into the rear belly pan for transmission cooling.

6. Rocker panels – Although subtle in appearance, the carefully shaped rocker panels help reduce lift and drag, while also contributing to stability during high cross winds. They also provide stone protection with the ZL1’s wider tires.

7. Rear spoiler – One of the most dramatic aero enhancements comes with the ZL1’s rear spoiler, which contributes approximately 150 pounds of down force at the cost of only 1 count of drag. It is taller and wider than the Camaro SS spoiler and incorporates the center high-mounted stop lamp.

The Camaro ZL1 goes on sale later in 2012. A convertible model will also be offered for the 2013 model year, starting in the summer of 2012. Pricing will be announced later.

[youtube_browser]7ABSlnD_OsQ[/youtube_browser]
 
Last edited:

Johnny03

Johnny
Established Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2006
Messages
195
Location
Methuen, MA
Nice. Love the engineering and technology that Ford and Chevy are bringing. My passion is with Ford, but that ZL1 is going to be sick!
 

ponyboyisaac

Now Kaioken...times 10!!
Established Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2006
Messages
4,585
Location
NE
was this a jab at the boss 302LS

3. Front splitter – Instead of a traditional front air dam, the ZL1 incorporates a racing-style splitter to help create downforce. Unlike some competitors’ vehicles that come with an add-on splitter, the ZL1’s does not have to be installed at the track – it is installed at the factory, and is designed with enough ground clearance for all driving conditions.
 

MisterChrome

New Member
Established Member
Joined
May 23, 2007
Messages
826
Location
CA
^ You saw that too huh? lol...the competition is funny and awesome between Ford and GM
 

03 DSG Snake

Unknown Cyborg
Established Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2002
Messages
21,049
Location
CA
was this a jab at the boss 302LS

3. Front splitter – Instead of a traditional front air dam, the ZL1 incorporates a racing-style splitter to help create downforce. Unlike some competitors’ vehicles that come with an add-on splitter, the ZL1’s does not have to be installed at the track – it is installed at the factory, and is designed with enough ground clearance for all driving conditions.

Then it doesn't really work. :read:
 

03 DSG Snake

Unknown Cyborg
Established Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2002
Messages
21,049
Location
CA
Yeah im sure Chevy would just throw on some splitter that doesnt work. :rolleyes:

Go look at a track car and tell me if the splitter has enough clearance to drive on any street. They are close to the ground for a reason.
 

BAD351W

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2010
Messages
450
Location
Meriden, CT
This isnt a track car. Its a street car made to engineered to also perform on the track. Perhaps they are incorporating a splitter that will perform as good as it can, but allowing ground clearance as well. In typical streetcar fashion.
 

Junior00

Hurter Of Delicate Vaginas
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
2,594
Location
Ga
Christ, do you guys ever quit whining about anything from GM? You can just drive the car to the track and haul ass without having to do anything to the car, one of the nice things about having the magnetic ride suspension. It's what the car was intended to be, fully capable on the track and street. Of course you could have a car sitting on the ground to maximize aero but it would defeat the purpose. You guys sound like a bunch of women bitching and nagging constantly.
 

6.0GTO

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2005
Messages
1,249
Location
Colorado
If the front end of the ZL1 has 265 pounds more downforce on the front end than an SS at 150mph, some of the changes have to be working. Unless they are lying about this like they are the weight distribution, the reason for a roll cage, lap times etc. Seems like we can't believe a thing in a GM statement.

With all of this performance fudging by Chevy the GT500 really should have no problem besting the ZL1 in nearly every category. Time will tell.
 

Formula51

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2004
Messages
2,351
Location
Greenville, SC
Anyone have similar data stashed away somewhere they could reference for the GT500 or maybe even Boss? I would be curious how the ZL1 compares.
 

ChiSVT

SVT 4 Life
Established Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2005
Messages
13,757
Location
IL
Anyone have similar data stashed away somewhere they could reference for the GT500 or maybe even Boss? I would be curious how the ZL1 compares.

Even if there was similar data it would hold little to no relevance. Where one car excels the other may not and vice-versa.

Ford could release all sorts of trivial data explaining how they ran a "supercar like" lap time at VIR, but what would that really mean?

Not much, unless you're one that buys into marketing hype. When these cars are tested, heads-up at the same event only then will we know how they stack up to one another. :beer:
 

Formula51

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2004
Messages
2,351
Location
Greenville, SC
Even if there was similar data it would hold little to no relevance. Where one car excels the other may not and vice-versa.

Ford could release all sorts of trivial data explaining how they ran a "supercar like" lap time at VIR, but what would that really mean?

Not much, unless you're one that buys into marketing hype. When these cars are tested, heads-up at the same event only then will we know how they stack up to one another. :beer:

Ahh, no. I am an engineer type and knowing how much downforce other competing cars with known performance levels and achievements (i.e. GT500 and Boss) make would be interesting to me. Just another bit of data to file away in that dark hole that is my head!

Heads up tests are certainly the best, but there is still the variable of the driver and the size and layout of the track tested at, etc. There are always variables. The engineer in me likes to look at the raw data and the design behind it almost as much as the results from head to head comparisons like you mentioned.:beer:
 

Ironhand

Banned
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
8,321
Location
.
If the front end of the ZL1 has 265 pounds more downforce on the front end than an SS at 150mph, some of the changes have to be working. Unless they are lying about this like they are the weight distribution, the reason for a roll cage, lap times etc. Seems like we can't believe a thing in a GM statement.

With all of this performance fudging by Chevy the GT500 really should have no problem besting the ZL1 in nearly every category. Time will tell.

The SS dont have a blower which alone weight 50-60lbs, plus all the intercooler stuff etc. So the nose weight probably goes up by the 265lbs on the ZL1.

Again dont believe crap like that.

was this a jab at the boss 302LS

3. Front splitter – Instead of a traditional front air dam, the ZL1 incorporates a racing-style splitter to help create downforce. Unlike some competitors’ vehicles that come with an add-on splitter, the ZL1’s does not have to be installed at the track – it is installed at the factory, and is designed with enough ground clearance for all driving conditions.

People with mullets or a belly over hang cant remove the splitter and GM doesnt want people to get stuck under the car.

Then it doesn't really work. :read:

Agreed.

By letting air pass under the splitter you are taking away is effectiveness.
 

6.0GTO

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2005
Messages
1,249
Location
Colorado
The SS dont have a blower which alone weight 50-60lbs, plus all the intercooler stuff etc. So the nose weight probably goes up by the 265lbs on the ZL1.

Again dont believe crap like that.



People with mullets or a belly over hang cant remove the splitter and GM doesnt want people to get stuck under the car.



Agreed.

By letting air pass under the splitter you are taking away is effectiveness.



I am not talking about static vehicle weight. I am talking downforce. That has nothing to do with the weight GM added to the ZL1. It was stated a regular Camaro SS at 150mph has 200lbs of lift. The ZL1 has 65lbs of downforce. That is 265lbs difference. That difference did not just happen. If I am wrong someone please correct me.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top