Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Engine/Tuning
Engine CARNAGE...#8... 5L KryPoNITE
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blacksmoke" data-source="post: 10869689" data-attributes="member: 124998"><p>Interesting yes. </p><p></p><p>I don't read what he believed to be true, but either he did not prove it, or I missed where he proved it.</p><p></p><p>I'm not sure if this shows the Mag Act does not mean aftermarket parts like we are referring to have to be proved to be the fault of the damage to the part before warranty can be voided.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>He says in his write up, "this shows an OEM can deny a warranty claim or outright void the related warranty, in the event of modification or abuse of the product, damage caused by the consumer, or failure of the consumer to properly maintain the product."</p><p></p><p>I don't see where JUST modding is in this clause and proves his point. He seems to put the modification part in there. I see the damaged caused by consumer or failure of the consumer to properly maintain it... I dont see where it says modification. I also am not reading this to the meaning that he is saying it means.. I'm reading this to almost enforce the Mag act as we understand it.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps I am misinterpreting this somehow and he is right?</p><p>I am not trying to argue on this. I would just like to know IF in fact the Mag Act was somehow misunderstood by so many. I just could not find where it meant air boxes only etc. like he said.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blacksmoke, post: 10869689, member: 124998"] Interesting yes. I don't read what he believed to be true, but either he did not prove it, or I missed where he proved it. I'm not sure if this shows the Mag Act does not mean aftermarket parts like we are referring to have to be proved to be the fault of the damage to the part before warranty can be voided. He says in his write up, "this shows an OEM can deny a warranty claim or outright void the related warranty, in the event of modification or abuse of the product, damage caused by the consumer, or failure of the consumer to properly maintain the product." I don't see where JUST modding is in this clause and proves his point. He seems to put the modification part in there. I see the damaged caused by consumer or failure of the consumer to properly maintain it... I dont see where it says modification. I also am not reading this to the meaning that he is saying it means.. I'm reading this to almost enforce the Mag act as we understand it. Perhaps I am misinterpreting this somehow and he is right? I am not trying to argue on this. I would just like to know IF in fact the Mag Act was somehow misunderstood by so many. I just could not find where it meant air boxes only etc. like he said. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Engine/Tuning
Engine CARNAGE...#8... 5L KryPoNITE
Top