Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
SN95 Cobras
Dyno tune vs Email (remote) tune
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ndinadis" data-source="post: 16367249" data-attributes="member: 194821"><p>I’ve used a remote tuner for my 3V that does a very good job.</p><p>He starts with a startup tunes and does idle logs and continues until it’s perfect. </p><p>The advantage of remote tuning in my mind over a dyno tune is collecting data and tuning the car under real load and driving conditions and the ability to concentrate on part throttle driving.</p><p></p><p>Dyno’s are great for wide open pulls in a safe environment but tunes generally are not able to test for street driving variable part throttle etc until they take the car out and test drive it. </p><p>Remote logging you can log any conditions you wish. </p><p>I’ve data logged 1/4 mile passes and driving around a neighborhood under 40km/h drying to fine tune the low rpm leaving from a stop and return to idle (I have cams with overlap and getting them to settle smother to idle after stopping took a log)</p><p></p><p>The only downsides to me are it’s more technical for you, I have my wife and and boost integrated into my tuner and have a laptop running beside me during logging to get as much data as possible. </p><p>The tuner also doesn’t have a chance to see or feel the car so if say you had a vacuum leak it’s on you to figure it out as they may or may not we able to tell something is off in the logs. </p><p>Also depending on how fast the car is and the roads available around you, WOT testing (normally only a small part of the process) can be sketchy if you don’t have somewhere safe.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ndinadis, post: 16367249, member: 194821"] I’ve used a remote tuner for my 3V that does a very good job. He starts with a startup tunes and does idle logs and continues until it’s perfect. The advantage of remote tuning in my mind over a dyno tune is collecting data and tuning the car under real load and driving conditions and the ability to concentrate on part throttle driving. Dyno’s are great for wide open pulls in a safe environment but tunes generally are not able to test for street driving variable part throttle etc until they take the car out and test drive it. Remote logging you can log any conditions you wish. I’ve data logged 1/4 mile passes and driving around a neighborhood under 40km/h drying to fine tune the low rpm leaving from a stop and return to idle (I have cams with overlap and getting them to settle smother to idle after stopping took a log) The only downsides to me are it’s more technical for you, I have my wife and and boost integrated into my tuner and have a laptop running beside me during logging to get as much data as possible. The tuner also doesn’t have a chance to see or feel the car so if say you had a vacuum leak it’s on you to figure it out as they may or may not we able to tell something is off in the logs. Also depending on how fast the car is and the roads available around you, WOT testing (normally only a small part of the process) can be sketchy if you don’t have somewhere safe. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
SN95 Cobras
Dyno tune vs Email (remote) tune
Top