Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Power-Adders
Dilemma 2.9 whipple (front intake) or vmp TVS 2
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="L8APEX" data-source="post: 14925440" data-attributes="member: 51947"><p>Yes, but he could only really speak for the older rear entry 2.3 and 2.9 Whipple's. </p><p>The biggest difference between the TVS and 2.3 Whipple was the TVS will have more mid to low torque but the Whipple will outpower the TVS at rpm. The TVS will produce more heat, especially with anything smaller than the 82mm pulley.</p><p>The 2.9 makes less power then the 2.3 below 12psi but it shines above 13psi and is ideal for 750-800 rwhp applications. </p><p>So it really depends on if the front inlet on the new Whipple makes the supercharger act similarly or differently than it's rear fed predecessors. If it's similar, the TVS may be the best option. If the newer 2.9 Whipple is better at making power at lower boost levels than before it could still be a good option. </p><p>It looks like I either take a chance as an early adopter and hope it pays off, or play it safe and go with a tested product.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nice to see I'm not alone! The more coyotes in the pack the better :beers:</p><p>What stage did you go with and how much boost are you running on pump gas? Is it easy do you get heat soaked?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="L8APEX, post: 14925440, member: 51947"] Yes, but he could only really speak for the older rear entry 2.3 and 2.9 Whipple's. The biggest difference between the TVS and 2.3 Whipple was the TVS will have more mid to low torque but the Whipple will outpower the TVS at rpm. The TVS will produce more heat, especially with anything smaller than the 82mm pulley. The 2.9 makes less power then the 2.3 below 12psi but it shines above 13psi and is ideal for 750-800 rwhp applications. So it really depends on if the front inlet on the new Whipple makes the supercharger act similarly or differently than it's rear fed predecessors. If it's similar, the TVS may be the best option. If the newer 2.9 Whipple is better at making power at lower boost levels than before it could still be a good option. It looks like I either take a chance as an early adopter and hope it pays off, or play it safe and go with a tested product. Nice to see I'm not alone! The more coyotes in the pack the better :beers: What stage did you go with and how much boost are you running on pump gas? Is it easy do you get heat soaked? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Power-Adders
Dilemma 2.9 whipple (front intake) or vmp TVS 2
Top