Department changed to the S&W M&P40..

Mt Twigbert

Member
Established Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2006
Messages
865
Location
Milwaukee, WI
Yup, our range said they were having too many reported problems w/ the Glock 22 and made the change to the S&W M&P40.. Can't be cheap because we have about 1,800 officers.. I heard Detroit and I think it was Pittsburgh also made the switch from Glock to S&W..

Anyone else having problems and their dept making a change from Glock?

MP40002.jpg
 

musclemustang65

NA again
Established Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2008
Messages
566
Location
Scottsboro, AL
I desperatly wish they would change our issue gun. Its a sig sauer .45 and it blows. I hate the trigger pull the first shot and with one in the chamber it only holds 8 rounds.
 

Krwy

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2006
Messages
1,397
Location
Bellflower, CA
I know its standard issue with California Highway Patrol. I shot it at the range and it feels really good.
 

carnut726

Member
Established Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2008
Messages
671
Location
NJ
My off-duty is a glock and i love it. Deprtmnt issue used to be S&W but we switched to the H & K USP 40 wit hthe Law enforcment trigger mod. That thing kicks the smith's ass in my humble opinion of course.
 

Hitman318

My other car is a cruiser
Established Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2008
Messages
1,169
Location
Prattville, AL
My off-duty is a glock and i love it. Deprtmnt issue used to be S&W but we switched to the H & K USP 40 wit hthe Law enforcment trigger mod. That thing kicks the smith's ass in my humble opinion of course.

Lucky man lol. i wish we got HKs. I like my glock 22 though. That S&W looks sweet
 

Spade

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2005
Messages
2,637
Location
Elysburg, PA
We just switched over to the Smith M&P 40 with the Streamlight light and it is very nice. I think you will be very happy.

DeviceMemoryhomeuserpicturesIMG0017.jpg
 

Junior00

Hurter Of Delicate Vaginas
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
May 20, 2005
Messages
2,594
Location
Ga
Yup, our range said they were having too many reported problems w/ the Glock 22 and made the change to the S&W M&P40.. Can't be cheap because we have about 1,800 officers.. I heard Detroit and I think it was Pittsburgh also made the switch from Glock to S&W..

Anyone else having problems and their dept making a change from Glock?

MP40002.jpg

What were all the reported problems you mention??? Curiosity has peaked now. The M&P is a nice peace but as someone mentioned, I personally like the HK better in terms of feel and pull.
 

Mt Twigbert

Member
Established Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2006
Messages
865
Location
Milwaukee, WI
What were all the reported problems you mention??? Curiosity has peaked now. The M&P is a nice peace but as someone mentioned, I personally like the HK better in terms of feel and pull.

Our range masters told us about jamming and stove pipes happening.. How often? I dunno, but from what I understand it would be once every few months.. But I guess that was unacceptable to them.. They believed it was a change in the magazine design that Glock made..

They had a big video for every officer to watch on the changes S&W made to better the 'Glock' design.. Most of it was little stuff to prolong the life of the weapon.. Such as thicker metal (at the tip) in certain spots incase the receive was dropped it will no longer bend and thus the ENTIRE gun was done.. Our Glocks, as I think all are, have 1 specific serial number stamped on all of the major pieces.. Thus, if one portion of the gun was flawed the WHOLE gun had to be sent in for repairs..

However, w/ the S&W there is only 1 serial number on the gun and if something fails then that 1 piece can be replaced and not the whole gun..

Also, another big improvement is each magazine and major component of the gun has batch markings.. This way, if our department finds a certain number of guns appeare to be flawed they can go back to S&W and they can do research regarding that 'batch of guns'.. This is something Glock didn't do.. Glock had no way of knowing when, where, by whom or what machine their parts were coming off and no way of correcting the problem..

I suspect it was a number of things that caused the change.. Either way, it must have been BIG for our dept. to make the change w/ over 1,800 officers.. Lots of $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$...

Edit: I don't doubt there are nicer guns out there but I have to carry what the department tells me to.. I suspect 80% of the decision to go to this gun is because it is of the same charastics as the Glocks (i.e. no hammer and no safety, kinda). To change to a new gun w/ 1,800 people is big but to change the entire style is more $$$ than I think our department could stomach.. Each officer only had 8 hours of training and as much ammo as we could shoot in that amount of time.. We were told to change to an entirely new gun would have been more like 20 hours of training if not more..
 
Last edited:

My Cobra

Gigidy Gigidy Gigidy
Established Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2004
Messages
3,114
Location
Franklin NC
our department has a glock armor that repairs and services the weapons every year. I was told that the guns that we have are swapped by glock every 5 years. We are about to get a new batch but the old ones only had to replace a few springs in mags that is it.

do you guys have to get a different holster or same type just for a different weapon? I hated having to swap to another holster.
 

bscarberry

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
1,400
Location
MI
I was just talking to one of the officers in the Casino I work at on Saturday about Detroit switching over to the S&W. He said he liked his glock better but that may be because that's all he's ever shot. I have small hands so I don't like the feel of the staggered clips personally
 

rubber duck

Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2007
Messages
784
Location
Chicago
I only wish our department would upgrade to a M&P40, hell I would consider a Glock an upgrade. We still carry OLD P226's, heavy bastards with a trigger pull that simulates rowing a boat, it was considered a big deal when they went from a 9mm to a .40. I've had to have my gun sent out twice in the last couple years for various bs. Multiple misfires, stovepipes, MAJOR malfunctions, lucky for me they happened on the range. What's worse is when they had to send it off I had to carry an old spare from the armory. Talk about crossing your fingers.
 

notchstang92

Spoolin'
Established Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2003
Messages
2,215
Location
South Shore, MA
thats our old weapon, i hated the friggin thing.

I had one of those. I HATED that gun. I have never had a gun stove pipe on me like that one did.

My buddy has an M&P .40. I'm not a fan. I will take my sig P229 anyday over it. He had a trigger job done and its not as bad, but there is someothing about it. It seems to snap too much in the recoil.
 

john_anch_ak

New Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2006
Messages
539
Location
Anchorage, Alaska
Yup, our range said they were having too many reported problems w/ the Glock 22 and made the change to the S&W M&P40.. Can't be cheap because we have about 1,800 officers.. I heard Detroit and I think it was Pittsburgh also made the switch from Glock to S&W..

Anyone else having problems and their dept making a change from Glock?

MP40002.jpg

I just received the August 2009 edition of "Gun Tests" and if any of you also subscribe to this fine magazine you might want to check out pages 4/5. It lists a few points by the L.A. Sheriff's Department regarding the S&W M&P 40. Here's just a couple of items in the article: "Quality of Smith and Wesson 9mm M&P pistols has become a concern because of a recent barrel failure on an in-service deputy's pistol, coupled with additional extraction jams on deputy recruit pistols (46% of recruit class experiencing some degree of malfunctions-mostly phase-2 jam failures to extract spent casings). Then the article goes on to say both the full size and compact M&P are no longer authorized for on duty/off duty. Anyone who uses one of these pistols and whose life depends on one of these pistols might want to pick up and read this article. I only pass this on because I don't want to see any of you get hurt because of a malfunctioning firearm.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top