Court question

94five0

*Click*
Established Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2005
Messages
595
Location
Alabama
different agencies have different standards of protocol. You have every right to ask, but don't be surprised if they tell you no.
 

jshen

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2003
Messages
3,858
Location
GA
Short answer- Probably
The burden of proving a case rests with the state. Most states have pretty much the same "foundation" requirements. In order to introduce-legally- the speed from radar we have to show a number of "certified" documents here. One of which is record showing that radar unit has been inspected within the past year and is accurate. I would have to check your state and see if that is a requirement. That is the benefit of getting a lawyer who specializes in traffic cases...he/she will know. I have seen some lawyers who don't have a clue about traffic and don't ask the right questions...
 

Nineonesix

New Member
Established Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2007
Messages
464
Location
Sacramento
Short answer- Probably
The burden of proving a case rests with the state. Most states have pretty much the same "foundation" requirements. In order to introduce-legally- the speed from radar we have to show a number of "certified" documents here. One of which is record showing that radar unit has been inspected within the past year and is accurate. I would have to check your state and see if that is a requirement. That is the benefit of getting a lawyer who specializes in traffic cases...he/she will know. I have seen some lawyers who don't have a clue about traffic and don't ask the right questions...

Well the ticket doesnt really warrant a lawyer. I just planned on asking two things. One beings the records on the gun, and two which traffic school the court recommends.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top