Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
2011-2014 Mustang Talk
Cost-effective NA power
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Spd2Stang" data-source="post: 11770982" data-attributes="member: 123908"><p>its no so much unbelievable but more so what makes more power. Headers or just a midpipe. </p><p>My 11 hit 426WHPSAE on a dynojet. Its possible no doubt with a o/r midpipe alone. All cars will respond differently though so its hard to say 1 vs the other is better option.</p><p></p><p>You will need at least a cam to come close to 450 though fro, what ive seen.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Spd2Stang, post: 11770982, member: 123908"] its no so much unbelievable but more so what makes more power. Headers or just a midpipe. My 11 hit 426WHPSAE on a dynojet. Its possible no doubt with a o/r midpipe alone. All cars will respond differently though so its hard to say 1 vs the other is better option. You will need at least a cam to come close to 450 though fro, what ive seen. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
2011-2014 Mustang Talk
Cost-effective NA power
Top