Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Conspiracy theorist unite
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KevinB120" data-source="post: 560569" data-attributes="member: 8163"><p>every conspiracy theory gives government agencys and leaders WAY too much credit, someone actually thinks they are THAT cunning?:bash: Granted, it was the same lack of communication and poor decision making "skills" in our government that also left us so friggin blind to pearl harbor to make it look almost done on purpose. We do have an invicible fat-cat mentallity to our national security, and for the most part, its part of being american to start with, you can never predict human behavior 100%. Its easy to play monday morning quarterback and pick apart what did or didnt happen. If there was a bad thunderstorm, or a airport tech glitch, and the flights were grounded at dulles or kennedy that day and caused enough interference for the hijackings to not happen, would it still be a conspiracy??? I dont think even the terrorists expected to be that successful, they probably were hoping for a one in four chance of hitting a target, hell they cant even hit the broad side of a barn with a shotgun usually. Let alone the complete collapse of BOTH towers, sometimes it just happens that way. Looking back at pear harbor, you wouldnt think theyd be as effective as they were either. The only thing "conspiracy" wise is that i believe 100% that flight 93 was shot down, but let sleeping dogs lie. Somethings are better left alone. You can go all day looking into 911//the kennedy assasination// twa flight 800//even the lunar landing, for crying out loud. Unless your were THERE, or part of the actuall investigation, you will never get all the facts. If you are ever "lucky" enough to be close to or part of even a local news story and then watch the reported result later that day, you never how FAR OFF reporting actually is from reality, its about as accurate as the 7-day forcast. People are not perfect nor have perfect recollection, and no one is truly an "expert" on anything. Its impossible. trying to find the "complete" facts about any news story would take the devotion of the rest of your life to collect all the information, let alone how you will interpet the information you do get. All this bullshit like "two couples were reportedly cheering at this or that" as some kind of evidence, is friggin stupid. Thats like back in ww11 when soldiers would decapitate japaneese soldiers and mount the heads on stakes on their tanks in combat, so are americans "animals" too? People are people, and can do anything good or bad, and then some.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KevinB120, post: 560569, member: 8163"] every conspiracy theory gives government agencys and leaders WAY too much credit, someone actually thinks they are THAT cunning?:bash: Granted, it was the same lack of communication and poor decision making "skills" in our government that also left us so friggin blind to pearl harbor to make it look almost done on purpose. We do have an invicible fat-cat mentallity to our national security, and for the most part, its part of being american to start with, you can never predict human behavior 100%. Its easy to play monday morning quarterback and pick apart what did or didnt happen. If there was a bad thunderstorm, or a airport tech glitch, and the flights were grounded at dulles or kennedy that day and caused enough interference for the hijackings to not happen, would it still be a conspiracy??? I dont think even the terrorists expected to be that successful, they probably were hoping for a one in four chance of hitting a target, hell they cant even hit the broad side of a barn with a shotgun usually. Let alone the complete collapse of BOTH towers, sometimes it just happens that way. Looking back at pear harbor, you wouldnt think theyd be as effective as they were either. The only thing "conspiracy" wise is that i believe 100% that flight 93 was shot down, but let sleeping dogs lie. Somethings are better left alone. You can go all day looking into 911//the kennedy assasination// twa flight 800//even the lunar landing, for crying out loud. Unless your were THERE, or part of the actuall investigation, you will never get all the facts. If you are ever "lucky" enough to be close to or part of even a local news story and then watch the reported result later that day, you never how FAR OFF reporting actually is from reality, its about as accurate as the 7-day forcast. People are not perfect nor have perfect recollection, and no one is truly an "expert" on anything. Its impossible. trying to find the "complete" facts about any news story would take the devotion of the rest of your life to collect all the information, let alone how you will interpet the information you do get. All this bullshit like "two couples were reportedly cheering at this or that" as some kind of evidence, is friggin stupid. Thats like back in ww11 when soldiers would decapitate japaneese soldiers and mount the heads on stakes on their tanks in combat, so are americans "animals" too? People are people, and can do anything good or bad, and then some. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Conspiracy theorist unite
Top