Comp 106400 with Whipple

cozmo2806

up in dat azz
Established Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2007
Messages
1,335
Location
28115
I personally think that they have a little too much intake duration. That's just my opinion tho.
 

wesking1

Member
Established Member
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
850
Location
SC
I had the 106360 in my last cobra with a 2.3 whipple, it sounded good and picked up 35 hp all the way around pretty much.. But it sure was a pain to drive.. If I was to ever do a cam setup again I would do a custom set with ported heads
 

aCiD

New Member
Established Member
Joined
May 6, 2008
Messages
113
Location
Ontario
I had the 106360 in my last cobra with a 2.3 whipple, it sounded good and picked up 35 hp all the way around pretty much.. But it sure was a pain to drive.. If I was to ever do a cam setup again I would do a custom set with ported heads

In what way was it a pain to drive?
 

wesking1

Member
Established Member
Joined
May 8, 2008
Messages
850
Location
SC
In what way was it a pain to drive?


Like stop and go you kind of have to ride the clutch to get it rolling a lot of the time.. And your mpg will decrease like crazy idk if that matters to you just an FYI lol
 

8URZ-28

Boost Freak
Established Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2005
Messages
1,486
Location
Baltimore, MD
Not sure the 106400s are a good choice for a blower setup, but are commonly used in NA motors. Id suggest the 106360s or 106460s for a 3.4
 

aCiD

New Member
Established Member
Joined
May 6, 2008
Messages
113
Location
Ontario
Not sure the 106400s are a good choice for a blower setup, but are commonly used in NA motors. Id suggest the 106360s or 106460s for a 3.4

That is what I thought, I had just seen some of the 106400s for sale used and was wondering. I'd rather have the correct choice from the beginning.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top