Camaros are better than Mustang?

[Rochard]

Check out the Wikipedia article for "Ford Mustang":

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Mustang

At the bottom of the "1969–1970" section is the following....

"The Mustang is commonly cited as being slower than the Chevy Camaro. Camaros are better than Mustangs."

Seems like some Camaro fan is a bit pissed off, no?

 

[XCELR8]

Lol

 

[Zorabot]

Its user edited, sign up log in and change it to whatever you want, and if the next guy dont like what you put, he'll change it.

I was looking at the Ford Car or Lincoln Car Wiki last week and it said the company was owned by Cadillac/GM.

 

[XCELR8]

Its user edited, sign up log in and change it to whatever you want, and if the next guy dont like what you put, he'll change it.

I was looking at the Ford Car or Lincoln Car Wiki last week and it said the company was owned by Cadillac/GM.

Are you serious? I thought Wikipedia was a reputable site... I didn't know it was like that!

 

[NoSlowGT]

Hell no. Teachers in highschool and college wont recognize Wikipedia as a reputable source. You can put anything on there you want. Eventually it is supposed to get approved but some stuff slips by like that.

 

[Agentman]

"however, most camaros are owned by gay men so I'll stick with my Mustang"

hahahahaha, that's great. Alright who did it????

 

[Agentman]

dp

 

[muzikmanwi]

"however, most camaros are owned by gay men so I'll stick with my Mustang"

hahahahaha, that's great. Alright who did it????

I thought it was funny. :banana:

 

[muzikmanwi]

Wow that was deleted in a hurry.

 

[astrodudepsu]

yea most of the BS posted on wikipedia doesn't last more than 24 hours. They have a version of the repost police that would put ours to shame. People spend hours upon hours on that stupid site just triple checking everything. It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.

 

[YesterdayAgain]

yea most of the BS posted on wikipedia doesn't last more than 24 hours. They have a version of the repost police that would put ours to shame. People spend hours upon hours on that stupid site just triple checking everything. It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.

Yeah seriously. Those pathetic nerds trying to maintain the integrity of their billion dollar entity. :rollseyes

 

[astrodudepsu]

funny, but a lot of those guys don't work for wikipedia, they just have an account name and a hard-on about certain topics//pages and have to make sure the information stays legit. I know some of these people (you meet all kinds in astrophysics) and trust me it is sad.

 

[Rochard]

"however, most camaros are owned by gay men so I'll stick with my Mustang"

hahahahaha, that's great. Alright who did it????

I figured it wouldn't last long.

I love Wikipedia... pick a subject your interested in.... and you can spend hours on it!

 

[Svets96]

Well, everything on wikipedia is BS, everyone including professors hack onto the sight and change stuff. Learned that in college.