Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
SN-95 and New Edge Mustangs
Buyer advice for a noob: mustang or camaro/firebird?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DHG1078" data-source="post: 13983320" data-attributes="member: 65442"><p>I haven't actually worked on a 94-95 so im not sure how much room there is to work on everything but I would think it would be similar to a pre-94. The 94/95 will be slower than the pre-94 though because it is a heavier car. the 4.6 is not a big step up. The non-pi 4.6 motors are absolute pigs. The pi motors are much better but still aren't the best platform.</p><p></p><p>Fox bodies are very easy to mod and work on. I don't know how mechanically inclined you are but you can do a lot of work on the motor in an afternoon if you know what your doing. Fox bodies can usually be found cheap but it can be a chore to find one in good condition. Bolt-ons make huge differences on the 5.0 compared to the 4.6 and the fox body is light compared to an sn-95. Parts are relatively cheap for the old 5.0 compared to the 4.6 too. The 4.6 is tougher and more expensive to work on. </p><p></p><p>what car you go with really comes down to what are your preferences, priorities and end goals of the car are. Any car you choose can be made to be fast. Some are just cheaper/ easier than others to work on. Different motors have different characteristics as well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DHG1078, post: 13983320, member: 65442"] I haven't actually worked on a 94-95 so im not sure how much room there is to work on everything but I would think it would be similar to a pre-94. The 94/95 will be slower than the pre-94 though because it is a heavier car. the 4.6 is not a big step up. The non-pi 4.6 motors are absolute pigs. The pi motors are much better but still aren't the best platform. Fox bodies are very easy to mod and work on. I don't know how mechanically inclined you are but you can do a lot of work on the motor in an afternoon if you know what your doing. Fox bodies can usually be found cheap but it can be a chore to find one in good condition. Bolt-ons make huge differences on the 5.0 compared to the 4.6 and the fox body is light compared to an sn-95. Parts are relatively cheap for the old 5.0 compared to the 4.6 too. The 4.6 is tougher and more expensive to work on. what car you go with really comes down to what are your preferences, priorities and end goals of the car are. Any car you choose can be made to be fast. Some are just cheaper/ easier than others to work on. Different motors have different characteristics as well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
SN-95 and New Edge Mustangs
Buyer advice for a noob: mustang or camaro/firebird?
Top