Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
BMW M6 vs GT500
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bluestreak89" data-source="post: 3814013" data-attributes="member: 37782"><p>If C&D number are off then why are you using them to say that the GT500 is faster? You ARE an idiot. Read your own posts dummy. :read:</p><p></p><p></p><p>Not to mention that Fors went and tweaked the car after it got there and MM&FF said it felt noticeably faster. You dont even know if the car that's on the streets is the one that ran 12.2 or not. I have said this over and over but WHY THE HELL would Ford send slow cars to the mags knowing it would cost them sales? It seems more likely that people will get the shelby's that ran 12.6,12.7 and 12.9 than the one that out of the blue runs 12.2 and since Evan Smith is not that great of a driver then he shouldnt be almost a half second faster than all the other mags in the same car no should he. That would mean the magazine drivers just got learners permits or just learned to drive a stick. but wait these same mags went 12.4 in a M6 and 11's in a Z06 so WTF is going on here? you have to ask yourself some of those questions. there is a reason lots of people are turning to the C6 as an alternative especailly since it rans faster than the GT500 when tested on the same day in the same conditions. BWHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bluestreak89, post: 3814013, member: 37782"] If C&D number are off then why are you using them to say that the GT500 is faster? You ARE an idiot. Read your own posts dummy. :read: Not to mention that Fors went and tweaked the car after it got there and MM&FF said it felt noticeably faster. You dont even know if the car that's on the streets is the one that ran 12.2 or not. I have said this over and over but WHY THE HELL would Ford send slow cars to the mags knowing it would cost them sales? It seems more likely that people will get the shelby's that ran 12.6,12.7 and 12.9 than the one that out of the blue runs 12.2 and since Evan Smith is not that great of a driver then he shouldnt be almost a half second faster than all the other mags in the same car no should he. That would mean the magazine drivers just got learners permits or just learned to drive a stick. but wait these same mags went 12.4 in a M6 and 11's in a Z06 so WTF is going on here? you have to ask yourself some of those questions. there is a reason lots of people are turning to the C6 as an alternative especailly since it rans faster than the GT500 when tested on the same day in the same conditions. BWHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
BMW M6 vs GT500
Top