BCS Reps issued warning over BCS System

noahsark2012

4V 500rwhp club
Established Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2009
Messages
1,080
Location
USA
ouch, looks like the Senate means business with this rigged BCS garbage system. Looks like we just might see some playoffs in the next few years.

Efforts to reform BCS face tall order in Congress - NCAA Football - CBSSports.com

WASHINGTON -- Rep. Joe Barton had a plane to catch, but he wanted to give college football officials a warning before leaving the highly publicized hearing.

Peering down from the podium, the Republican said in his Texas twang that unless the officials took action toward a playoff system in two months, Congress would likely move on his legislation aimed at forcing their hand.

More than three months have passed, and Barton's bill hasn't moved. Such is the way with college football and Congress.

For years, lawmakers have railed against the Bowl Championship Series, calling it an unfair way to select a national champion. A lot of righteous thundering, however, has not yielded anything on the legislative front.

President Barack Obama joined the fray last year, saying shortly after his election that there should be a playoff system.

"I'm going to throw my weight around a little bit," he said. "I think it's the right thing to do."

But now that he's in office, the recession, two wars and health care reform have taken him away from football, at least so far.

It seems unlikely Congress will take the initiative. To figure out why, just look at a map of the United States.

The current college bowl system features a championship game between the two top teams in the BCS standings, based on two polls and six computer rankings. After the title game, eight other schools fill in the remaining slots for Orange, Sugar, Fiesta and Rose bowls.

Under the BCS, six conferences get automatic bids - the ACC, Big East, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-10 and SEC, in states from Massachusetts to Florida to California to Washington to Illinois. Those conference receive far more money than the conferences that don't get automatic bids.

"There are just too many senators and congressmen who represent districts where major BCS schools have a very dominant influence," said Gary Roberts, dean of the Indiana University School of Law-Indianapolis and an expert on sports law.

"So you're not going to get any senators from Louisiana or Alabama or Florida or Georgia or Tennessee or Ohio - those are all states with major state universities that are major BCS powerhouses."

There's been no bill introduced in the Senate this year to revamp the BCS, although GOP Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah said he's looking into it. Mountain West Conference champion Utah was bypassed for last season's national championship despite going undefeated.

Barton, the top Republican on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, is one of several House members who has authored legislation aimed at forcing a playoff. His bill, which has four co-sponsors, would ban the promotion of a postseason NCAA Division I football game as a national championship unless it's the outcome of a playoff.

California Republican Gary Miller has three co-sponsors for his bill that would deny federal funds to schools in the Division I Football Bowl Subdivision unless the championship resulted from a playoff system. And Neil Abercrombie, a Democrat from Hawaii, has a nonbinding resolution calling for a playoff system and for a Justice Department investigation. He's got five co-sponsors.

Roberts says it's not enough.

"Sure, you've got Orrin Hatch from Utah who's unhappy," he said. "There are a handful of congressmen and senators from districts or states that feel like the BCS disadvantages them and their constituents, but they're a small minority of the overall Congress."

If there's a silent majority of lawmakers on the other side, "it's only silent as long as the issue is just a bunch of noise," Roberts said. "If a bill actually got some traction, you can bet that (Texas coach) Mack Brown would call the Texas senators, and [Alabama coach] Nick Saban would call the Alabama senators. There's no traction in Congress for doing anything about the BCS."

Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer, for example, told the Associated Press that while he supports a playoff system, "the one caveat is I have [a New York school] Syracuse, which benefits from the funding situation because the Big East gets in. You'd have to preserve that."

Barton insisted in a telephone interview that there's a good chance his bill will pass the House this year.

"The key is finding a place on the agenda" in a year crowded with high-profile issues, he said. "We'll keep plugging away."

Hatch, who held a hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee's subcommittee on antitrust, competition policy and consumer rights last month, has focused more on getting the Justice Department to investigate the BCS for antitrust violations. He told the AP he's working on letters to both the department and Obama making that case.

"Like I've said in the past, I'm not real anxious to get the government involved in regulating college football, but those who have the power to fix the system should do so - and they should do so voluntarily," Hatch said. "The BCS people don't appear too willing to consider any alternatives."

He said the Justice Department should look into the matter and report back to Congress either way -- even if it determines there is no antitrust violation.

"I think this is a big enough issue," Hatch said. "People try to pass this off as some itty-bitty issue. Hey, it involves hundreds of millions of dollars, it involves unfairness, mistreatment."

The Justice Department declined to say whether it would investigate the BCS.

Stephen Ross, director of the Penn State Institute for Sports Law, Policy and Research, and a former lawyer for the Justice Department's antitrust division, said the department will likely look into Hatch's request -- but more as a senatorial courtesy than anything else.

He said the department generally takes the position that its resources be devoted on actions that can't be brought by a private party, and would be unlikely to launch a full-blown investigation into the BCS. Someone other than the department could bring a lawsuit challenging the BCS.

Congress has given the issue a high-profile look this year with a pair of media-generating hearings, but it also held them in the past -- including a couple in 2003 that didn't lead to any legislative remedy.

That year, the House and Senate Judiciary Committees both held hearings -- the latter one requested by Delaware Sen. Joe Biden, now vice president.

"What about the teams that aren't in these conferences and the fans that aren't in these conferences?" he asked at the time. "It looks un-American. It really does. It looks not fair. It looks like a rigged deal."
 

noahsark2012

4V 500rwhp club
Established Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2009
Messages
1,080
Location
USA
wtf!?!? Am I missing something? What leverage does Congress have over the NCAA?

They have no business trying to change the rules of Football

well if the system is geared towards the more popular schools and it's not fair to all the colleges, and the people in control of the BCS don't want to make the system fair, then Congress does by all means have the right to step in.

It's very possible the BCS is in violation of anti-trust laws, and if someone makes a big enough racket, the BCS could be forced into drawing up a playoff system.

I think some teams like Boise State, Utah, and teams like that from various conferences that are usually not considered to be top runners, could make a big argument they've been screwed by the system, and not only that, but screwed out of some money as well.
 

03_SVT_Freak

Stirring the pot :D
Established Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2004
Messages
7,551
Location
Lubbock TX
while i dont agree with congress stepping in, something does need to be done about this. i hate the way the current system works. smaller schools who dont have the funds like UT, OU, USC, and so on dont even have a chance, even if thier teams are good teams that year, Utah for example. i would really like to see a playoff system, and if it takes congress stepping in to get one, then by all means, GO CONGRESS
 

canibus

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2004
Messages
16,744
Location
Santa Barbara Ca.
Sure we all want a playoff system, but I have a feeling it might take away some of the exitement away. As long as your team is in the running, the rankins won't be as important. being #1 won't mean shit.
 

KingBlack

I'm more stupid than I post
Established Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
6,248
Location
myrtle beach
i you make a playoff system then you9 need to compensate the student athlete. these guys are already make a gazillion bucks for the schools but if you want them to play more games, thats already hard on their bodies, pay them
 

PSUCOBRA96

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2007
Messages
9,210
Location
Maryland
i you make a playoff system then you9 need to compensate the student athlete. these guys are already make a gazillion bucks for the schools but if you want them to play more games, thats already hard on their bodies, pay them

hah pay them? they already go to school for free..that is their payment
 

BigSweezey

<insert witty title here>
Established Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2004
Messages
1,351
Location
Georgia
i you make a playoff system then you need to compensate the student athlete. these guys are already make a gazillion bucks for the schools but if you want them to play more games, thats already hard on their bodies, pay them

Trust me when I say...students get paid. Atleast the starters anyway.
 

GTSpartan

Yield right!!!!
Established Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2004
Messages
9,351
Location
The Woods
hah pay them? they already go to school for free..that is their payment

+1

The $50k+++ education and priceless knowledge you gain is payment enough.

Paying them more money will only make them even more lazy when it comes to academics, which 98% of these ex-athletes will need after school.
 

GTSpartan

Yield right!!!!
Established Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2004
Messages
9,351
Location
The Woods
Oh, one more thing. How in the f*** did Notre Lame get their sweet ass deal for a BCs bowl????

They don't even deserve to get a bid, but somehow do, and get end up getting blown out by much higher class competition.
 

95oRANGEcRUSH

Who's that whore?
Established Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2002
Messages
1,664
Location
NEO
wtf!?!? Am I missing something? What leverage does Congress have over the NCAA?

They have no business trying to change the rules of Football

Sure they do. Congress appropriates federal funding for student loans, grants, etc for higher education. If the BCS and Universities don't like what Congress is doing, don't take federal funds.
 

badazzar15

Banned
Joined
Sep 22, 2008
Messages
543
Location
Republik of Kaliforniakstan
Sure they do. Congress appropriates federal funding for student loans, grants, etc for higher education. If the BCS and Universities don't like what Congress is doing, don't take federal funds.

Ok, some non-athletes are getting Federal Grants to attend Universities. How does this give Congress the right to weigh-in on the NCAA? Most student-athletes are on full scholarships? If this was the case, they should have a problem with the school's financial aid dept., not their Football programs
 

Niks97cobra

Ready to Go!
Established Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2005
Messages
3,073
Location
Savannah, Ga
There should have been a playoff system from the beginning. Every football division from elementary to NFL has a playoff except the top D1 schools.
 

HYBRED

That Just Happened
Established Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2007
Messages
10,701
Location
Dallas TX
I don't know about other schools, but at Texas A&M football was almost entirely self-funded - through merchandising, ticket sales, donations and boosters. The fancy stadium, training center, scholarships etc weren't paid for by the school itself for the most part.
 

Skaarj

Undead
Established Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2009
Messages
57
Location
St. Petersburg
Sure we all want a playoff system, but I have a feeling it might take away some of the exitement away. As long as your team is in the running, the rankins won't be as important. being #1 won't mean shit.

Rankings could still be important for deciding who plays in the playoff spots or get s a wildcard bid.
 

smokedgt

Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2007
Messages
86
Location
dallas TX
Does anyone actually have a proposed playoff system drawn out? There can only be so many teams in the playoff, so how are those teams decided? Rankings? There also can't be too many teams in the playoffs because there isn't an unlimited amount of time between the end of the regular season and whenever the season needs to be over. What about the "smaller schools" that people are saying didn't have a chance before in the BCS, I doubt they would have a chance getting to the playoffs. At least before they would play in a small bowl game.
 

Robert Francis

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2002
Messages
1,763
Location
Taylor, Mich
Just another thing the federal govt wants to do to run your life! If they get control of college playoffs, what's next? High school playoffs if they don't like your system? Where does it end?

Pay college athletes? They're already getting a free ride worth 40k a year at most major universities that most of us would love to have available to our sons and daughters! And at many of these major institutions they don't have to do anything at the school itself, such as attending a classes leading to a meaningful education, but simply play in their sport. And they don't have to stay in school and of course if they are good - they get free publicity and promotion to get into the pro's.
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top