Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Engine/Tuning
Arh first engine mod for 2013 gt na car?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Coyote'13" data-source="post: 13493183" data-attributes="member: 149738"><p>Just do what I did and go straight for the gold and make your first mod a supercharger. Nah I'm jk u said budget minded.</p><p></p><p>The cai is kinda a waste unless your supercharged bc that will increase boost by a pound or so with the Paxton anyways. I don't doubt it would make a couple ponies though at best. </p><p></p><p>Throttle body is a complete waste, no one buys those for the 5.0</p><p></p><p>Boss intake is gonna be a waste going by your driving description. </p><p></p><p>Best bang for your buck? </p><p></p><p>-o/r h or x pipe with aed tune. Total price $550 The difference between the h and x is only a couple hp. It's more about what sound you want from those 2.</p><p> -xpipe = more raspy and some go as far as saying more European like sound</p><p> -hpipe = more of a deeper muscle car sound</p><p></p><p>Now this would matter if you planned to get long tubes in the future of course. After much debate I decided against them myself due to issues with o2 sensors with little gain for the price/headache. Now don get me wrong bc I'm sure many would argue those and say its worth it but IMO it's not. If you plan to stay n/a then long tubes may be for you bc every hp counts. </p><p></p><p>I mean if you get long tubes you will need a new mid pipe anyways so now add that to the budget. </p><p></p><p>E85 like other said would be some good gains. You might double your gains if you toss that into the equation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Coyote'13, post: 13493183, member: 149738"] Just do what I did and go straight for the gold and make your first mod a supercharger. Nah I'm jk u said budget minded. The cai is kinda a waste unless your supercharged bc that will increase boost by a pound or so with the Paxton anyways. I don't doubt it would make a couple ponies though at best. Throttle body is a complete waste, no one buys those for the 5.0 Boss intake is gonna be a waste going by your driving description. Best bang for your buck? -o/r h or x pipe with aed tune. Total price $550 The difference between the h and x is only a couple hp. It's more about what sound you want from those 2. -xpipe = more raspy and some go as far as saying more European like sound -hpipe = more of a deeper muscle car sound Now this would matter if you planned to get long tubes in the future of course. After much debate I decided against them myself due to issues with o2 sensors with little gain for the price/headache. Now don get me wrong bc I'm sure many would argue those and say its worth it but IMO it's not. If you plan to stay n/a then long tubes may be for you bc every hp counts. I mean if you get long tubes you will need a new mid pipe anyways so now add that to the budget. E85 like other said would be some good gains. You might double your gains if you toss that into the equation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Engine/Tuning
Arh first engine mod for 2013 gt na car?
Top