Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
93R Inside. Literally.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mustangmanjeff" data-source="post: 13641482" data-attributes="member: 29948"><p>while compared to todays times and world of 200 -300hp 4 door kia hyundai and honda 4 cylinder and 6 cylinder sedans, but mm&ff got mid 13's with a stock 1 with tire only dr' swap years back link below to the article and times, and bone stock stock tires low 14's @100, 13.6@101 is not bad for a car from 1993 , even the corvettes,lt1 slowmaros, porsche, ferarri's werent much faster then that?Of top of my head only thing faster then that back in 1993 was the viper and corvette zr1. power to weight was key and handled really good <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" />oke:</p><p></p><p></p><p>Heres the article</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.stangbangers.com/00vs95vs93_CobraR_Article.htm" target="_blank">00 vs 95 vs 93 Cobra R Article</a></p><p></p><p>they ran 13.61@101 almost call it a 13.6@102 with that trap pretty good for the low power back in 1992-1993 :shrug:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mustangmanjeff, post: 13641482, member: 29948"] while compared to todays times and world of 200 -300hp 4 door kia hyundai and honda 4 cylinder and 6 cylinder sedans, but mm&ff got mid 13's with a stock 1 with tire only dr' swap years back link below to the article and times, and bone stock stock tires low 14's @100, 13.6@101 is not bad for a car from 1993 , even the corvettes,lt1 slowmaros, porsche, ferarri's werent much faster then that?Of top of my head only thing faster then that back in 1993 was the viper and corvette zr1. power to weight was key and handled really good :poke: Heres the article [url=http://www.stangbangers.com/00vs95vs93_CobraR_Article.htm]00 vs 95 vs 93 Cobra R Article[/url] they ran 13.61@101 almost call it a 13.6@102 with that trap pretty good for the low power back in 1992-1993 :shrug: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
93R Inside. Literally.
Top