Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Time Slip Bar
851 RWHP 670 RWTQ/ New to site
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sisky wolf" data-source="post: 7370010" data-attributes="member: 77782"><p><strong>Mustang Dyno</strong></p><p></p><p>Sorry...the no's were given by Mustang engineers after we pulled the No's we did..Shut down the computer and recalibrated just to make sure..the owner and tuner could not believe the no's..Check out Musscle Mustangs and fast fords..they ran comparisons and found some Std. trannys pulling more Hp than Automatics...depending on the tranny...Mustang Dyno Engineers say it is bullshit to throw a common no. at HP loss ..this tranny is a Tremec t-56 Cobra R with Viper innerds and 26 spline in put shaft..Engs say this tranny beause of its heavy gears and close build the loss is 25%...</p><p></p><p></p><p>We made 4 more runs on the dyno after recalibrating and pulled the same no.s</p><p>within 4 to 5 HP</p><p></p><p>First time at the track left the MT ET Street radials on to see if they would hook(had some MTET streets screw fit with tubes waiting to try out) </p><p>Ended up frying the tires all the way thru the 1/8 mile....shut down and coasted to the 1/4.....13.8 at 70 mph. Cracked the bell housing,surged the SC,bent the shaft on the New Powermate alternator,and fried the Mcloud twin disc clutch.</p><p>Now breaking in a new Spec twin disc clutch rated at 1395" TQ.</p><p></p><p>Go to <a href="http://www.speedfreaksinc.com" target="_blank">www.speedfreaksinc.com</a> and check out the othe cars he has built and tuned...some were very dissapointed with their numbers</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sisky wolf, post: 7370010, member: 77782"] [b]Mustang Dyno[/b] Sorry...the no's were given by Mustang engineers after we pulled the No's we did..Shut down the computer and recalibrated just to make sure..the owner and tuner could not believe the no's..Check out Musscle Mustangs and fast fords..they ran comparisons and found some Std. trannys pulling more Hp than Automatics...depending on the tranny...Mustang Dyno Engineers say it is bullshit to throw a common no. at HP loss ..this tranny is a Tremec t-56 Cobra R with Viper innerds and 26 spline in put shaft..Engs say this tranny beause of its heavy gears and close build the loss is 25%... We made 4 more runs on the dyno after recalibrating and pulled the same no.s within 4 to 5 HP First time at the track left the MT ET Street radials on to see if they would hook(had some MTET streets screw fit with tubes waiting to try out) Ended up frying the tires all the way thru the 1/8 mile....shut down and coasted to the 1/4.....13.8 at 70 mph. Cracked the bell housing,surged the SC,bent the shaft on the New Powermate alternator,and fried the Mcloud twin disc clutch. Now breaking in a new Spec twin disc clutch rated at 1395" TQ. Go to [url]www.speedfreaksinc.com[/url] and check out the othe cars he has built and tuned...some were very dissapointed with their numbers [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Time Slip Bar
851 RWHP 670 RWTQ/ New to site
Top