Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Kill Drive-Thru
5.0 vs challenger 392
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ChiSVT" data-source="post: 10947160" data-attributes="member: 28706"><p>The Mustang and Challenger are two different animals. The Challenger is truly a muscle car as it's nearly the size of a full size sedan.</p><p></p><p>The Mustang is a pony car, way lighter, more nimble and of course way cheaper.</p><p></p><p>When it comes to performance, the 392 fairs well in a straight-line against a GT, but in every other aspect would get annihilated because of it's sheer size.</p><p></p><p>That doesn't mean it's a bad car for the money though. I'd much rather drive across country in a Challenger than I would in a Mustang or Camaro. Having 470hp on-tap is just an awesome bonus. :thumbsup:</p><p></p><p>I also love the styling, I never cared for the Charger but always had a soft spot for the Challenger since day one. Especially when you consider the sheer size of it.</p><p></p><p>There aren't a lot of 4300lb land yachts that look this good.</p><p></p><p><img src="http://newcarpdf.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/2011-geiger-car-dodge-challenger-srt8-392-front-side-view.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>If I had the means, I'd have both in my garage.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ChiSVT, post: 10947160, member: 28706"] The Mustang and Challenger are two different animals. The Challenger is truly a muscle car as it's nearly the size of a full size sedan. The Mustang is a pony car, way lighter, more nimble and of course way cheaper. When it comes to performance, the 392 fairs well in a straight-line against a GT, but in every other aspect would get annihilated because of it's sheer size. That doesn't mean it's a bad car for the money though. I'd much rather drive across country in a Challenger than I would in a Mustang or Camaro. Having 470hp on-tap is just an awesome bonus. :thumbsup: I also love the styling, I never cared for the Charger but always had a soft spot for the Challenger since day one. Especially when you consider the sheer size of it. There aren't a lot of 4300lb land yachts that look this good. [IMG]http://newcarpdf.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/2011-geiger-car-dodge-challenger-srt8-392-front-side-view.jpg[/IMG] If I had the means, I'd have both in my garage. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Kill Drive-Thru
5.0 vs challenger 392
Top