Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Kill Drive-Thru
5.0 vs challenger 392
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="5 ltr. beater" data-source="post: 10946576" data-attributes="member: 3756"><p>....i guess thats defiently one way to put it....but i think you're forgetting the fact that this car wasnt meant to be "bang for the buck" type of car...</p><p></p><p>heck if you're gonna make that statement, might as well put down exoctic cars for that matter as well....most lambo's do 11's stock in the 1/4 and have a price tag over 1/4 of a million dollars. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite9" alt=":eek:" title="Eek! :eek:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":eek:" /></p><p></p><p>guess that wud be considered REALLY REALLY slow for it motor vs. cost.</p><p></p><p>people just buy the car because they are die-hard mopar fans.</p><p></p><p>Dodge recognized that its previous challenger was getting its ass handed to it by the Chevy and Ford boys, and dedcided to up its game and respond with the 392. end of story.</p><p></p><p>little pricey if you ask me...but die hard mopar fans who dont want to buy a mustang or camaro, can now compete with a car that now has a chance and not venture away from the brand they love. ;-)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="5 ltr. beater, post: 10946576, member: 3756"] ....i guess thats defiently one way to put it....but i think you're forgetting the fact that this car wasnt meant to be "bang for the buck" type of car... heck if you're gonna make that statement, might as well put down exoctic cars for that matter as well....most lambo's do 11's stock in the 1/4 and have a price tag over 1/4 of a million dollars. :eek: guess that wud be considered REALLY REALLY slow for it motor vs. cost. people just buy the car because they are die-hard mopar fans. Dodge recognized that its previous challenger was getting its ass handed to it by the Chevy and Ford boys, and dedcided to up its game and respond with the 392. end of story. little pricey if you ask me...but die hard mopar fans who dont want to buy a mustang or camaro, can now compete with a car that now has a chance and not venture away from the brand they love. ;-) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Kill Drive-Thru
5.0 vs challenger 392
Top