Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
2020 GT500 Weight Revealed + Critical Specs | GT350 Updates
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="biminiLX" data-source="post: 16273631" data-attributes="member: 7795"><p>As you and Premi are comparing the M5 and it appears you are driving a convertible, then it appears performance isn’t the priority.</p><p>And I’d like to see the MSRP of a commonly optioned M5, as it will almost certainly be significantly higher.</p><p>My point has always been anything over 4000# isn’t a good starting point.</p><p>That said, 4225# is quoted base weight from what I can tell. </p><p>I’d like to see an actual car scaled versus Ford documents, but we have 2 members telling us the main competitors are 3880# (auto ZL1) and 4380# (light base narrow body Redeye).</p><p>I’m guessing the CFTP GT500 will be 4150# or a touch less, so it’s 270# heavy but 110hp over a ZL1 and 230# lighter but 40hp down from a light RE.</p><p>I think we’re all disappointed at the weight, but I think we need to see the performance before passing final judgment on the package as a whole.</p><p>I’m going to guess we will all be happy with the performance, so let’s weight and see what the actual cars scale at and the numbers they put out.</p><p>I’m still a buyer and I’m guessing true Mustang guys who prioritize performance and are able to afford it, will also.</p><p>Let’s hope these factors allow more of us to find cars without crazy ADM!</p><p>-J</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="biminiLX, post: 16273631, member: 7795"] As you and Premi are comparing the M5 and it appears you are driving a convertible, then it appears performance isn’t the priority. And I’d like to see the MSRP of a commonly optioned M5, as it will almost certainly be significantly higher. My point has always been anything over 4000# isn’t a good starting point. That said, 4225# is quoted base weight from what I can tell. I’d like to see an actual car scaled versus Ford documents, but we have 2 members telling us the main competitors are 3880# (auto ZL1) and 4380# (light base narrow body Redeye). I’m guessing the CFTP GT500 will be 4150# or a touch less, so it’s 270# heavy but 110hp over a ZL1 and 230# lighter but 40hp down from a light RE. I think we’re all disappointed at the weight, but I think we need to see the performance before passing final judgment on the package as a whole. I’m going to guess we will all be happy with the performance, so let’s weight and see what the actual cars scale at and the numbers they put out. I’m still a buyer and I’m guessing true Mustang guys who prioritize performance and are able to afford it, will also. Let’s hope these factors allow more of us to find cars without crazy ADM! -J [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
2020 GT500 Weight Revealed + Critical Specs | GT350 Updates
Top