Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
2011-2014 Mustang Talk
2014 Mustang to have IRS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ChiSVT" data-source="post: 9644215" data-attributes="member: 28706"><p>Sounds about right for a 350Z, generally 3325-34xxlbs stock depending on options. The 370Z is smaller though. They made the rear-end considerably shorter.</p><p></p><p><img src="http://cdn.cbsi.com.au/story_media/339292933/nissan-370z_1.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p><img src="http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2006/11/WindowsLiveWriter/2006Nissan350ZReviewAutobytel_117B4/2006-Nissan-350Z%5B2%5D.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I see what you're saying. Although we have no figures on factory acceptance tests for the rear-suspension setups. For example, the Supra makes 315ft/lbs stock, but it's been proven reliable well over 700ft/lbs. That rear-suspension could easily be more than enough in a 500-600hp+ factory car.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think the Mustang could be a little smaller, especially if they decide to dump the retro theme in the future. :beer:</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ChiSVT, post: 9644215, member: 28706"] Sounds about right for a 350Z, generally 3325-34xxlbs stock depending on options. The 370Z is smaller though. They made the rear-end considerably shorter. [IMG]http://cdn.cbsi.com.au/story_media/339292933/nissan-370z_1.jpg[/IMG] [IMG]http://www.houstoncars.org/wp-content/uploads/2006/11/WindowsLiveWriter/2006Nissan350ZReviewAutobytel_117B4/2006-Nissan-350Z%5B2%5D.jpg[/IMG] I see what you're saying. Although we have no figures on factory acceptance tests for the rear-suspension setups. For example, the Supra makes 315ft/lbs stock, but it's been proven reliable well over 700ft/lbs. That rear-suspension could easily be more than enough in a 500-600hp+ factory car. I think the Mustang could be a little smaller, especially if they decide to dump the retro theme in the future. :beer: [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
2011-2014 Mustang Talk
2014 Mustang to have IRS
Top