Thanks .
I'm going to change my break system .. I would like to know the weight of the stock breake system to compare them?
Thanks
Ali
Actually, VERY few "straight line" Terminator owners go to GT brakes. And the ones that do have pretty much dedicated track cars with very aggressive ET goals that can be best met by reducing rotational weight. I personally prefer to keep my stock brake system and look for other areas to shave weight. :beer:Please don't tell me you're going to upgrade your power by a couple of hundred horsepower and then downgrade your brakes to some crappy Mustang GT brakes like the straight-line Terminator owners like to do?! :rollseyes
Actually, VERY few "straight line" Terminator owners go to GT brakes. And the ones that do have pretty much dedicated track cars with very aggressive ET goals that can be best met by reducing rotational weight. I personally prefer to keep my stock brake system and look for other areas to shave weight. :beer:
The "BEST" way to reduce unsprung, parasitic rotating mass is to go to a lightweight, 2pc rotor assembly with an aluminum hat. Compliment that with shit canning the heavy iron caliper bracket and iron PBR caliper and replace them with an aluminum fixed caliper Y2KR four piston Brembo.
I'm looking for ( wilwood ) W6A Big Brake Front Brake Kit and W4A Big Brake Rear Parking Brake Kit . What you think ?
The "BEST" way to reduce unsprung, parasitic rotating mass is to go to a lightweight, 2pc rotor assembly with an aluminum hat. Compliment that with shit canning the heavy iron caliper bracket and iron PBR caliper and replace them with an aluminum fixed caliper Y2KR four piston Brembo.
One of my pet peeves is a guy that upgrades the power of his Mustang by 200 RWHP and then downgrades the braking capibilities of the vehicle. We are talking saftey issues here! :idea:
:thumbsup::coolman::beer: