Renting or living with mom and dad a few more months in order to save more money (to put towards the house) is a bad idea?
Adding more money to your payment (P.M.I.) is acceptable?
Adding more money to your payment (P.M.I.) is acceptable?
Renting or living with mom and dad a few more months in order to save more money (to put towards the house) is a bad idea?
Adding more money to your payment (P.M.I.) is acceptable?
Renting or living with mom and dad a few more months in order to save more money (to put towards the house) is a bad idea?
Adding more money to your payment (P.M.I.) is acceptable?
Yeah I think it is. Rates have jumped up 1.5% in less than 6 months. That's thousands of dollars out the window. PMI isn't permanent.
What's wrong with locking in your rate or at least finding out how long your lender will lock it in?
Look what got us in this mess: People buying houses they couldn't afford.
I take it you don't own a house? have you ever owned a house?What's wrong with locking in your rate or at least finding out how long your lender will lock it in?
Look what got us in this mess: People buying houses they couldn't afford.
What would be wrong with locking in a rate? Plenty of people do it. Interest rates are a gamble.
Where I come from I want to have as much equity in my house as possible and I want as little as possible being paid in insurance, interest, etc.., How about you?
I take it you don't own a house? have you ever owned a house?
Typing from it right now.
Forget P.M.I. for a moment. Look at the interest paid over the life of the loan.
Someone asked about a car. That's a throw away product. People look at a house as an investment.
Typing from it right now.
Forget P.M.I. for a moment. Look at the interest paid over the life of the loan.
Someone asked about a car. That's a throw away product. People look at a house as an investment.
I know it's a throw away versus an investment and there's no PMI or equivalent, hence admitting it's apples to oranges, but it's still a valid question in the sense that if I can't afford a set percentage for a down payment, are you saying I can't afford the car? And what is that percentage?
On your forget PMI and to just look at the interest over the course of the loan, what's your point again? Sure everyone wants the most equity and as little interest as possible, but sometimes it's just not that easy. Anything I can put 20% down on I wouldn't recommend my worst enemy living in, but rest assured I'll own a house one day.
interesting your "why not lock a rate in" threw me off. NO ONE locks in an interest rate longer than 30 days 45 days max and that is very very rare.Typing from it right now.
Forget P.M.I. for a moment. Look at the interest paid over the life of the loan.
Someone asked about a car. That's a throw away product. People look at a house as an investment.
Thats the way I see it.interesting your "why not lock a rate in" threw me off. NO ONE locks in an interest rate longer than 30 days 45 days max and that is very very rare.
your down payment has ZERO to do with being able to afford a home. I bought my house with 3% down and it wasn't even my 3%. I could afford the house expenses but had zero money for down payment, closing costs or anything else LOL! yeah I paid PMI for a bit but who cares? I had my own home and am still in it 12 years down the road.
as far as interest, that is tax deductible so you get a tax advantage as well so your real interest cost is somewhat less.
I stand corrected. seems 30-60 is the industry average. but even at 60 with an extension if you can get it you are not going to be able to save another 5-10% for a down payment.You are incorrect with your 45 day max.
this is obvious and totally misses my point. I said how much your down payment is has zero to do with whether or not you can afford a mortgage. as I said I could easily afforded my mortgage and house expenses with 3% down. 20% would have been even better but I didn't have 3% let alone 20%. I was quite happy to get in at 3% and pay PMI for a few years.Your down payment can mean the difference between paying for the mortgage every month and not being able to do so.
again you are stating the obvious. but not everyone that can afford the costs of home ownership has 20% down. which goes back to my point that having 20% down really has nothing to do with weather or not you can afford the house. yes it makes it easier for some but if you don't buy more than you can afford you don't need 20% and paying PMI is a small price to pay for having your own home, IMHOI ran the numbers when I bought my house. There was a nice difference between having the 20% and not having the 20%. That interest and PMI is more shit going to the bank and not to you. Eventually you get the PMI removed.
what bank lets you lock in your rate longer than that?
sorry I am not buying it. from what I have experienced it was 30 days. the industry average seems to be 30-60. when you are building a house you get a builders loan not a mortgage and the rules are a bit different. Any bank locking in for longer than 60 days without adjusting the rate is shooting themselves in the foot. and any homeowner that does without some serious reasons is just stupid. interest rates bounce more than candy samples tits when she walks. and a bank locking in longer than 60 days stands to lose thousands of dollars on one loan, potentially millions over their customer base. so I am not buying you being able to lock in an interest rate long enough to save up that additional 10% down payment.That I can't tell you but they are out there. Plus, there are even greater lock in periods for people building houses. Of course it all depends on the lender and such.