Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
SN-95 and New Edge Mustangs
1967 Mustang, want input on engine options???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Henrik" data-source="post: 3213619" data-attributes="member: 154481"><p>Go with the 351W and stroke it to 408Cui. I´ve heard that the cylinderwalls on a 427 are a little too thin. I had a 393W in my 67 hardtop, 11.5 comp. pistons ported Edelbrock RPM heads, mech cam with 540 lift and 284 degrees, medium rise intake, 625 cfm carb, msd, 2400 stall and a 373 posi rear. I was FAST. Go with the stroker, a lot of high winding horsepower for a very good price! Just my .02!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Henrik, post: 3213619, member: 154481"] Go with the 351W and stroke it to 408Cui. I´ve heard that the cylinderwalls on a 427 are a little too thin. I had a 393W in my 67 hardtop, 11.5 comp. pistons ported Edelbrock RPM heads, mech cam with 540 lift and 284 degrees, medium rise intake, 625 cfm carb, msd, 2400 stall and a 373 posi rear. I was FAST. Go with the stroker, a lot of high winding horsepower for a very good price! Just my .02! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
SN-95 and New Edge Mustangs
1967 Mustang, want input on engine options???
Top