Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
2013-14 Shelby GT500
13/14 GT500 allocation situation VS past top tier Mustang & implications for future?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="reason4treason" data-source="post: 13421273" data-attributes="member: 134879"><p>when you say, "US" you mean that the demand side, the customer side is what drives FMC's gameplan for the way allocations are distributed?</p><p></p><p>it seems to me like Ford's relationship with each individual dealer is the largest factor by far , and the customer is secondary. otherwise, they could just fill each VOC and it would be first come, first serve. Ford/SVT could just add a fee to sell one along with whatever other costs are included in final price. maybe just make the holdback proportionately larger and include it in there.</p><p></p><p>some customers get pretty irked, for example those of us who got lied to in early spring 2012 had to deal with a stampede by the time the end of June got here and we learned the truth. FMC knows there are customers who got lied to by dealers. I'm curious about whether just that sort of thing has been going on for 20 years or if the 13/14 was an extremely unusual case. </p><p></p><p>when was the first Mustang that required allocations? did any of them in the 90s?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="reason4treason, post: 13421273, member: 134879"] when you say, "US" you mean that the demand side, the customer side is what drives FMC's gameplan for the way allocations are distributed? it seems to me like Ford's relationship with each individual dealer is the largest factor by far , and the customer is secondary. otherwise, they could just fill each VOC and it would be first come, first serve. Ford/SVT could just add a fee to sell one along with whatever other costs are included in final price. maybe just make the holdback proportionately larger and include it in there. some customers get pretty irked, for example those of us who got lied to in early spring 2012 had to deal with a stampede by the time the end of June got here and we learned the truth. FMC knows there are customers who got lied to by dealers. I'm curious about whether just that sort of thing has been going on for 20 years or if the 13/14 was an extremely unusual case. when was the first Mustang that required allocations? did any of them in the 90s? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
2013-14 Shelby GT500
13/14 GT500 allocation situation VS past top tier Mustang & implications for future?
Top