Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
2020+ Shelby GT500 Mustang
12/1 vs 9.5/1 19 gt350 makes 494whp!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SlowShelby_TX" data-source="post: 16272985" data-attributes="member: 195758"><p>This is part of why I detest this type of discussion. SAE correction factors mitigate this to some degree, but even then it will vary with altitude and engine aspiration methods. A dyno is just a tool at the end of the day. It is best to use the same one and compare results from similar weather, but that is not how the internet works. Even SAE factors don't take into account adiabatic efficiency of compressors.</p><p></p><p>I certainly mean no disrespect to the OP. I just think people are a little nutty for reading into the numbers too much.</p><p></p><p>As far as the transmission loss discussion, the GT350 transmission would never be behind the GT500 mill. The DCT is probably more efficient than the manual that they would have had to use. Just spitballing here <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SlowShelby_TX, post: 16272985, member: 195758"] This is part of why I detest this type of discussion. SAE correction factors mitigate this to some degree, but even then it will vary with altitude and engine aspiration methods. A dyno is just a tool at the end of the day. It is best to use the same one and compare results from similar weather, but that is not how the internet works. Even SAE factors don't take into account adiabatic efficiency of compressors. I certainly mean no disrespect to the OP. I just think people are a little nutty for reading into the numbers too much. As far as the transmission loss discussion, the GT350 transmission would never be behind the GT500 mill. The DCT is probably more efficient than the manual that they would have had to use. Just spitballing here ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
2020+ Shelby GT500 Mustang
12/1 vs 9.5/1 19 gt350 makes 494whp!
Top