Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
10 most expensive cars ever produced
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="03CobraBro" data-source="post: 9169987" data-attributes="member: 6490"><p>Aerodynamics and aesthetics are 2 different things. This isn't like gluing a vent on the side of a Mustang or sticking a piece of gutter guard inside of hole on a Corvette referring to it as a brake cooler. Ugly or not the Aero design is what gave this car the ability to reach a speed that no other production car has been able to achieve.</p><p></p><p>In all honesty the Bugatti Veyron is a bulbous monstrosity, it weighs almost twice what the SSC weighs, (as much as a Honda Ridge Line) and its equipped with a horribly inefficient 8 liter 16 cylinder engine(!!) with 4 turbo chargers(!!!) that doesn't even come close to producing as much power as the SSC.</p><p></p><p>Just because that British turd on Top Gear doesn't like it doesn't mean we all have to file in line like a bunch of unopinionated lemmings.</p><p></p><p>Not to mention which car would run a better lap time on an open road course... (Curves)</p><p></p><p>My money is on the car that weighs less than 4450lbs. ;^) </p><p></p><p>Also for being as horrible as people make out they are quite the innovators.</p><p><a href="http://www.shelbysupercars.com/news-012209.php" target="_blank">Shelby SuperCars - SSC - Exotic Luxury SuperCars</a></p><p></p><p>Maybe if a non American company had produced it we'd all be oogling over it.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, with that being said, out of all of the cars on that list I'd have to lean in favor the CCXR. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="03CobraBro, post: 9169987, member: 6490"] Aerodynamics and aesthetics are 2 different things. This isn't like gluing a vent on the side of a Mustang or sticking a piece of gutter guard inside of hole on a Corvette referring to it as a brake cooler. Ugly or not the Aero design is what gave this car the ability to reach a speed that no other production car has been able to achieve. In all honesty the Bugatti Veyron is a bulbous monstrosity, it weighs almost twice what the SSC weighs, (as much as a Honda Ridge Line) and its equipped with a horribly inefficient 8 liter 16 cylinder engine(!!) with 4 turbo chargers(!!!) that doesn't even come close to producing as much power as the SSC. Just because that British turd on Top Gear doesn't like it doesn't mean we all have to file in line like a bunch of unopinionated lemmings. Not to mention which car would run a better lap time on an open road course... (Curves) My money is on the car that weighs less than 4450lbs. ;^) Also for being as horrible as people make out they are quite the innovators. [url=http://www.shelbysupercars.com/news-012209.php]Shelby SuperCars - SSC - Exotic Luxury SuperCars[/url] Maybe if a non American company had produced it we'd all be oogling over it. Anyway, with that being said, out of all of the cars on that list I'd have to lean in favor the CCXR. :D [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
10 most expensive cars ever produced
Top