Highest compression for boost?

SVTDice

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2009
Messages
1,486
Location
Florida
I thought compression ratio and boost was restricted by fuel. Not so much boost. If you have the proper fuel(s) I thought your budget was the limit. I've seen builds with 12:1 and 13:1 compression and upwards of 20+ PSI of boost on E85 and E98. Or am I missing something here?
 

OW99

Member
Established Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2012
Messages
550
Location
north houston
I thought compression ratio and boost was restricted by fuel. Not so much boost. If you have the proper fuel(s) I thought your budget was the limit. I've seen builds with 12:1 and 13:1 compression and upwards of 20+ PSI of boost on E85 and E98. Or am I missing something here?

No I think you got it. They're talking about pump gas.
 

snakeraper11b

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2011
Messages
1,768
Location
Los Angeles
What is the oem compressed gasket thickness for both? I can't find it anywhere.

.038" for 99-01 cobras. Not sure for the 03-04's, NA will chime in with the specs I'm sure. I've found most companies state they use a .036" compressed height for their compression calculations.
 

snakeraper11b

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2011
Messages
1,768
Location
Los Angeles
They are using a thinner head gasket and a shorter deck clearance.

Most use .036" compressed height and 8.933" deck height to calculate their compression vs stock at .038" and 8.937" (some do use 8.937, just depends on the company)
 
Last edited:

na svt

say no to power adders
Established Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
11,248
Location
Beavercreek, Ohio
I thought compression ratio and boost was restricted by fuel. Not so much boost. If you have the proper fuel(s) I thought your budget was the limit. I've seen builds with 12:1 and 13:1 compression and upwards of 20+ PSI of boost on E85 and E98. Or am I missing something here?

you are correct.
 

RPM4DAZ

Because stock sucks!!
Established Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
184
Location
So Cal
In response to my first post. I did say not the " most efficient "... With his compression I wouldn't think he would lose large amounts of torque with a little bit of cam tuning. Of course, I realize that does have to do with where they are now. And, NA is absolutely correct. It has been proven time and time again more compression makes more power. Period!!! You can get into a lot different variables and arguments, but, compression makes power. As for the manifold pressure of "only" 5 psi. My Cobra when I got it was remanned with a 9.1:1 compression build and everything else stock. I got it retuned and did some playing with it. Stock intake manifold, BBK 62mm throttlebody shorty FRPP headers, Bassani X with cats and Borla mufflers. 412HP at the wheels with a mere 5 1/2" @ 6500 rpm. I do not know what the cams are degreed at otherwise. I would say at a completely stock location with the sprockets. So pressure, at almost any amount does make a difference...
 

71catruck

Member
Established Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
721
Location
gilroy california
one thing i was reading a on this site months ago is that running high compresion and low boost will result in higher cylinder temps at tdc. idk the exact increase i just cant remember but my new motor is 10.0-1 and will be at 14psi on the eaton. im getting tuned for 91 with meth since there isnt alot of e-85. seams better than 8.5 at 18psi and heat soaking your blower.
 

SlowSVT

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2004
Messages
8,272
Location
Los Angeles
In response to my first post. I did say not the " most efficient "... With his compression I wouldn't think he would lose large amounts of torque with a little bit of cam tuning. Of course, I realize that does have to do with where they are now. And, NA is absolutely correct. It has been proven time and time again more compression makes more power. Period!!! You can get into a lot different variables and arguments, but, compression makes power. As for the manifold pressure of "only" 5 psi. My Cobra when I got it was remanned with a 9.1:1 compression build and everything else stock. I got it retuned and did some playing with it. Stock intake manifold, BBK 62mm throttlebody shorty FRPP headers, Bassani X with cats and Borla mufflers. 412HP at the wheels with a mere 5 1/2" @ 6500 rpm. I do not know what the cams are degreed at otherwise. I would say at a completely stock location with the sprockets. So pressure, at almost any amount does make a difference...

:rollseyes

I can't even fathom how this post even relates :shrug: What does this prove?

So an NA Cobra engine on max boost will make more power than a Terminator engine running max boost on pump gas? I've never seen that happen perhaps you can "elaborate".
 

DSG2003Mach1

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Premium Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2004
Messages
16,146
Location
Central Fl
With a good tune a forged flat top will hold up fine. These engines are not the archaic engines of the 60s, they much better combustion chambers, better materials and hellish better engine management systems, 10:1 is absolutely safe with moderate boost.

what do you consider moderate boost?
 

snakeraper11b

Active Member
Established Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2011
Messages
1,768
Location
Los Angeles
one thing i was reading a on this site months ago is that running high compresion and low boost will result in higher cylinder temps at tdc. idk the exact increase i just cant remember but my new motor is 10.0-1 and will be at 14psi on the eaton. im getting tuned for 91 with meth since there isnt alot of e-85. seams better than 8.5 at 18psi and heat soaking your blower.

Already briefly addressed that in post 27. It's pretty general numbers and not exact,. but close to the real world results.
 

SlowSVT

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2004
Messages
8,272
Location
Los Angeles
one thing i was reading a on this site months ago is that running high compresion and low boost will result in higher cylinder temps at tdc. idk the exact increase i just cant remember but my new motor is 10.0-1 and will be at 14psi on the eaton. im getting tuned for 91 with meth since there isnt alot of e-85. seams better than 8.5 at 18psi and heat soaking your blower.

High compression AND high boost will result in even higher cylinder temps than the scenario you described. Basic physics.

14 psi @ 10:1 running 91 swill :uh oh:

You’re nearing the detonation limit of 8.5:1 at that boost level and octane. I think with that compression you wouldn't want to exceed 8 psi
 

71catruck

Member
Established Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
721
Location
gilroy california
Yes 10.0-1 at 14psi is way to much for pump gas if you aren't running a ridicules safe tune. That's why I will be running the meth to boost the octane of my fuel. And talking about a stock 03-04 motor making more power with max boost than a n/a cobra you have to consider the forged vs. non forged bottom end. The forged will take a lot more aggressive tune. But a forged 10.0-1 motor should be able to handle an aggressive tune with 14psi. I guess ill see what she makes when I get my tune.
 

SlowSVT

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2004
Messages
8,272
Location
Los Angeles
Yes 10.0-1 at 14psi is way to much for pump gas if you aren't running a ridicules safe tune. That's why I will be running the meth to boost the octane of my fuel. And talking about a stock 03-04 motor making more power with max boost than a n/a cobra you have to consider the forged vs. non forged bottom end. The forged will take a lot more aggressive tune. But a forged 10.0-1 motor should be able to handle an aggressive tune with 14psi. I guess ill see what she makes when I get my tune.

As stated earlier. Disregard the fact the NA Cobra engine doesn't use a forged bottom end and let's pretend it does. A forged bottom end will handle a higher load but is no match for detonation and will crumble along with the best of them.

You plan on using meth to protect the engine from total destruction :uh oh: Your new engine days are numbered taking that approach. Just a "hiccup" in the meth injection system, an empty reservoir or a clogged injector when you need it the most will have you writing big checks while learning a hard lesson. It's best to build an FI engine that can stand on it's own without outside help. I remember Kenny Bell posting on this topic and was very adamant about the dangers of relying on meth injection to keep an FI engine from self destructing.

At 10:1 I would turn the boost down to 8 psi to minimize the chance of blowing a very expensive engine.
 

71catruck

Member
Established Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2010
Messages
721
Location
gilroy california
And how is a 03-04 cobra motor at 8.5-1 with a 2.9 or bigger running 22+ psi any different. Maybe my comparison on the numbers isnt exact but the concept is
 

SlowSVT

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2004
Messages
8,272
Location
Los Angeles
And how is a 03-04 cobra motor at 8.5-1 with a 2.9 or bigger running 22+ psi any different. Maybe my comparison on the numbers isnt exact but the concept is

If he's relying on meth to keep his engine from exploding there is no difference other than the level of destruction.

At 22+ psi those guys run E85 or race gas.
 

SlowSVT

Well-Known Member
Established Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2004
Messages
8,272
Location
Los Angeles
I have posted this diagram here before but I thought I would show it on this thread to illustrate the difference in what the combustion chamber sees "high compression vs. low compression" on an FI engine. It's a bit exaggerated regarding the numbers but that was done to make it easier to understand. The physics never change though. This should clear things up for some who didn't have a clear understanding on what's involved.

HIvsLOWCOMPRESSIONFIENGINE.jpg
 

na svt

say no to power adders
Established Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
11,248
Location
Beavercreek, Ohio
I have posted this diagram here before but I thought I would show it on this thread to illustrate the difference in what the combustion chamber sees "high compression vs. low compression" on an FI engine. .

Who created that? This is a pet peeve of mine, the "then" should be a "than."
 

Users who are viewing this thread



Top