He actually made a strong point. When expensive cars are leased more often than purchased, there's really no need for them to be super reliable beyond a typical lease period. Even with outright purchases, the owners of higher end cars don't keep them much beyond 3 or 4 years before trading up for the next new thing. Manufacturers build cars for new buyers, not used buyers. The saying "don't buy/own a German luxury car outside of warranty" bears that out. Used sales don't help the manufacturer's bottom line, so it doesn't matter a whole lot what kind of owner experience those buyers have. "You want reliable? Go buy a $35K Honda Accord, not a $35K used high end luxury car, peasant."
And with that, I've been thinking about switching us over to a leasing household for high end cars. I want to experience some more of the "finer" things in life before I die and not be committed to it for years on end. A nice 24/36 month lease might be right up our alley. That way we're not paying as much for the car, and it frees up money for other toys. (I saw a 2009 Aston Martin DBS that I fell in love with. Drop dead gorgeous car! It would be worth owning that car even if I all I did was pull it out of the garage every now and then just to look at it.)
Thoughts on expensive cars needing to be reliable?