Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
Younger brother got pulled over
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="wesessiah" data-source="post: 13635730" data-attributes="member: 111232"><p>we agree then, we were just misunderstanding each other.</p><p> </p><p>i'm personally big on staying on the side of caution. i recently had a situation that some would arrest on, but got a warrant anyway. a guy stole an item from a store and left, the store had the license plate of the vehicle he was a passenger in and had him on surveillance well enough to see the clothes he was wearing. paid a visit to the registered owner's house twice (with the second time being 5 hours later) made contact with the owner, who said another guy was in the house in bed. got the guy to get out of bed and he still had the same clothes on from the video. he denied knowing anything about the item, but the driver said there was an item matching that description that the other guy placed into the vehicle, but he didn't know it was stolen and didn't know where it was. so i had the guy from the video still in the same clothing, one party admitting the item was placed into his vehicle by the guy, but i was at his house without the item, and a considerable amount of time had passed. some officers may not agree with my decision, but the magistrate did, and i didn't want to incur any liability for any possible violation, plus i had the guys information. i'm sure people not in law enforcement wouldn't see any issue with him being arrested on the spot, but we do make an effort to observe people's rights, even if some have a looser interpretation of probable cause.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="wesessiah, post: 13635730, member: 111232"] we agree then, we were just misunderstanding each other. i'm personally big on staying on the side of caution. i recently had a situation that some would arrest on, but got a warrant anyway. a guy stole an item from a store and left, the store had the license plate of the vehicle he was a passenger in and had him on surveillance well enough to see the clothes he was wearing. paid a visit to the registered owner's house twice (with the second time being 5 hours later) made contact with the owner, who said another guy was in the house in bed. got the guy to get out of bed and he still had the same clothes on from the video. he denied knowing anything about the item, but the driver said there was an item matching that description that the other guy placed into the vehicle, but he didn't know it was stolen and didn't know where it was. so i had the guy from the video still in the same clothing, one party admitting the item was placed into his vehicle by the guy, but i was at his house without the item, and a considerable amount of time had passed. some officers may not agree with my decision, but the magistrate did, and i didn't want to incur any liability for any possible violation, plus i had the guys information. i'm sure people not in law enforcement wouldn't see any issue with him being arrested on the spot, but we do make an effort to observe people's rights, even if some have a looser interpretation of probable cause. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
Younger brother got pulled over
Top