Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
**** YOU, GM. Just die.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="GTSpartan" data-source="post: 16228804" data-attributes="member: 21531"><p>Jesus people...trust but verify before feeding into all this hyperbole.</p><p></p><p>More facts for everyone:</p><p></p><p>GM has already recalled <u><strong>AND</strong></u> repaired 991,343 of the 1.4 million vehicles recalled so far. They are requesting an exemption on certain vehicles that it says use a different inflator design and should not be included. All data to this point has backed up their claim. The NHTSA has so far played along. They could have easily ordered the full recall if they felt justified in doing so. Who knows, maybe they ultimately will. As usual, the media has done a brilliant job in crafting the message it wants everyone to hear.</p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.detroitnews.com/story/business/autos/general-motors/2019/06/19/gm-seeks-avoid-takata-recalls-fourth-straight-year/39602461/" target="_blank">GM seeks to avoid Takata recalls for fourth straight year</a></p><p></p><p>So they've already repaired some of the affected vehicles, but are requesting that certain models be omitted, and have data to support their argument. In a rational manner, explain why this makes them morally bankrupt? Is this the same type of moral bankruptcy that kept Ford from self reporting (they had all the data that showed there was an issue) that their Explorer's were flipping over due to a tire/suspension flaw? Or was that different?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="GTSpartan, post: 16228804, member: 21531"] Jesus people...trust but verify before feeding into all this hyperbole. More facts for everyone: GM has already recalled [U][b]AND[/b][/U] repaired 991,343 of the 1.4 million vehicles recalled so far. They are requesting an exemption on certain vehicles that it says use a different inflator design and should not be included. All data to this point has backed up their claim. The NHTSA has so far played along. They could have easily ordered the full recall if they felt justified in doing so. Who knows, maybe they ultimately will. As usual, the media has done a brilliant job in crafting the message it wants everyone to hear. [URL='https://www.detroitnews.com/story/business/autos/general-motors/2019/06/19/gm-seeks-avoid-takata-recalls-fourth-straight-year/39602461/']GM seeks to avoid Takata recalls for fourth straight year[/URL] So they've already repaired some of the affected vehicles, but are requesting that certain models be omitted, and have data to support their argument. In a rational manner, explain why this makes them morally bankrupt? Is this the same type of moral bankruptcy that kept Ford from self reporting (they had all the data that showed there was an issue) that their Explorer's were flipping over due to a tire/suspension flaw? Or was that different? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
**** YOU, GM. Just die.
Top