Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Wilson Combat or Nighthawk?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="John Ryder" data-source="post: 16365548" data-attributes="member: 154310"><p>The biggest I've read is the "test target" Les gives. They'll claim it being 50 yards when the claim is within 5 yards.</p><p></p><p>Some tidbits on cutting corners on certain parts fitting. Barrel fitting included. My TRS had the lower lugs cut thin and suffered premature failure (within 3500 rounds) so I'm biased on my opinion here.</p><p></p><p>It's not a secret of LB's refusal to use a commander length frame with proper rail length. He sticks to GI rails despite the commander needing a different travel to be optimal.</p><p></p><p>Some claims against parts quality. The hardness issues between the slide and slide stop and issue of notch peening. A few things I have read, but also, these issues were not only from Rob's mouth.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="John Ryder, post: 16365548, member: 154310"] The biggest I've read is the "test target" Les gives. They'll claim it being 50 yards when the claim is within 5 yards. Some tidbits on cutting corners on certain parts fitting. Barrel fitting included. My TRS had the lower lugs cut thin and suffered premature failure (within 3500 rounds) so I'm biased on my opinion here. It's not a secret of LB's refusal to use a commander length frame with proper rail length. He sticks to GI rails despite the commander needing a different travel to be optimal. Some claims against parts quality. The hardness issues between the slide and slide stop and issue of notch peening. A few things I have read, but also, these issues were not only from Rob's mouth. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Wilson Combat or Nighthawk?
Top