Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Engine/Tuning
Who has gone from ProCal to intake/tune?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="86merc" data-source="post: 12674755" data-attributes="member: 82554"><p>Yes. But they had issues and couldn't give me a base and best run layover. It picked up nice down low. Peak numbers did not show great gains. We had the "Octane adjust" set to "on" as we heard some pinging on the first pull as it had our crappy winter blend gas in the tank. Although the data logs did not show any knock sensor readings. </p><p></p><p>Stock the car made 358 rwhp & 355 rwtq. With the ProCal it made 363 rwhp & 356 rwtq. </p><p></p><p>Mid range torque did improve nicely at 20-30 ft/lbs through most of the rpm band. Horsepower was just about 5-8 rwhp through out most of the rpm range. Tapering off up top until peak.</p><p></p><p>My best 1/4 mile ET has been matched with the stock tune and the ProCal tune. I think mainly because the gains over 5,000 RPM (Where I launch on slicks) are minimal with the ProCal. If I did lap times on a road course I think the lower end torque would show some improvement in times. And of course it is very enjoyable on the street.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="86merc, post: 12674755, member: 82554"] Yes. But they had issues and couldn't give me a base and best run layover. It picked up nice down low. Peak numbers did not show great gains. We had the "Octane adjust" set to "on" as we heard some pinging on the first pull as it had our crappy winter blend gas in the tank. Although the data logs did not show any knock sensor readings. Stock the car made 358 rwhp & 355 rwtq. With the ProCal it made 363 rwhp & 356 rwtq. Mid range torque did improve nicely at 20-30 ft/lbs through most of the rpm band. Horsepower was just about 5-8 rwhp through out most of the rpm range. Tapering off up top until peak. My best 1/4 mile ET has been matched with the stock tune and the ProCal tune. I think mainly because the gains over 5,000 RPM (Where I launch on slicks) are minimal with the ProCal. If I did lap times on a road course I think the lower end torque would show some improvement in times. And of course it is very enjoyable on the street. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Engine/Tuning
Who has gone from ProCal to intake/tune?
Top