Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
What is Ford doing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="black4vcobra" data-source="post: 16310333" data-attributes="member: 82394"><p>Yes, I've said the same thing forever. The 3V 4.6 should never been the Mustang GT's engine either.</p><p></p><p>Remember how overhead cam engines were supposed to have a higher specific output than pushrod engines? Well in 98, the LS1 made way more power per cubic inch than the 2V and only in 99 did Ford get the 4.6 to make the same specific output of the SS/TA F-bodies.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="black4vcobra, post: 16310333, member: 82394"] Yes, I've said the same thing forever. The 3V 4.6 should never been the Mustang GT's engine either. Remember how overhead cam engines were supposed to have a higher specific output than pushrod engines? Well in 98, the LS1 made way more power per cubic inch than the 2V and only in 99 did Ford get the 4.6 to make the same specific output of the SS/TA F-bodies. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
What is Ford doing
Top