Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Cobra Forums
The Terminator
Interior and Exterior Body & Chassis
undertray for our cars?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SlowSVT" data-source="post: 7279848" data-attributes="member: 20202"><p>I think the SN95 CD measures in at .36 (the S197 is .37). That is not very good. A C6 measure around .28. My Subaru Outback is suppose to be .32 but that seem a bit optimistic (it’s a friggen station wagon with a roof rack) . The Fox4 chassis is pretty dirty aerodynamically speaking. I've had my Cobra up against the speed limiter and it didn't do anything particularly weird considering. Some guys have stated things start getting spooky at anything over 160.</p><p></p><p>The science of aerodynamics at time can yield results are quite unexpected and can be hard to predict.</p><p></p><p>I was considering ditching my rear spoiler but am a little reluctant. Supposedly it does provide some downforce. Ford did some wind tunnel testing on the Terminator but I think the purpose was to make sure there were nothing abnormally wrong or any whistling noise generated at highway speeds. Other then that very little was done to optimize the shape of the car which would have impacted every contour on the body. Nissan took the opposite approach with the new GTR and the results are not too esthetically pleasing but it is slippier then a Vette so they claim.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SlowSVT, post: 7279848, member: 20202"] I think the SN95 CD measures in at .36 (the S197 is .37). That is not very good. A C6 measure around .28. My Subaru Outback is suppose to be .32 but that seem a bit optimistic (it’s a friggen station wagon with a roof rack) . The Fox4 chassis is pretty dirty aerodynamically speaking. I've had my Cobra up against the speed limiter and it didn't do anything particularly weird considering. Some guys have stated things start getting spooky at anything over 160. The science of aerodynamics at time can yield results are quite unexpected and can be hard to predict. I was considering ditching my rear spoiler but am a little reluctant. Supposedly it does provide some downforce. Ford did some wind tunnel testing on the Terminator but I think the purpose was to make sure there were nothing abnormally wrong or any whistling noise generated at highway speeds. Other then that very little was done to optimize the shape of the car which would have impacted every contour on the body. Nissan took the opposite approach with the new GTR and the results are not too esthetically pleasing but it is slippier then a Vette so they claim. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Cobra Forums
The Terminator
Interior and Exterior Body & Chassis
undertray for our cars?
Top