Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Interior and Exterior
Under hood temps and dynoing with the hood up explained
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ViperBlueCobra" data-source="post: 11701665" data-attributes="member: 23466"><p>OMG!</p><p></p><p>Simple facts of what Tucker is stating is all that needs to be analyized, if at all. Some forget he too is a mustang enthusiast and wants the best product out there as well. </p><p></p><p>Size of intake inlet points and air filter surface area, combined with air speeds, proves that cold air intakes(most) are better than the box stock intake. I have not seen anything that has proved otherwise.</p><p></p><p>Hood up on a dyno run or testing, as Jay has explained, makes sense to me. </p><p></p><p>The arguement that the stock box benefits more in the "real" world is retarded. Simply because of the hole locations in relative to areas where air comes into the engine compartment. Claims that ford designed it this way for ram air effect is all bs. I've never seen any literature anywere from ford stating this.</p><p></p><p>9 times out of 10, the factory intakes for the mustang has been designed with conservation and EPA regulations in mind, not performance.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ViperBlueCobra, post: 11701665, member: 23466"] OMG! Simple facts of what Tucker is stating is all that needs to be analyized, if at all. Some forget he too is a mustang enthusiast and wants the best product out there as well. Size of intake inlet points and air filter surface area, combined with air speeds, proves that cold air intakes(most) are better than the box stock intake. I have not seen anything that has proved otherwise. Hood up on a dyno run or testing, as Jay has explained, makes sense to me. The arguement that the stock box benefits more in the "real" world is retarded. Simply because of the hole locations in relative to areas where air comes into the engine compartment. Claims that ford designed it this way for ram air effect is all bs. I've never seen any literature anywere from ford stating this. 9 times out of 10, the factory intakes for the mustang has been designed with conservation and EPA regulations in mind, not performance. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
Interior and Exterior
Under hood temps and dynoing with the hood up explained
Top