Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
2011-2014 Mustang Talk
Twins vs single?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CPRsm" data-source="post: 13417350" data-attributes="member: 81705"><p>The correction factor is flawed at high altitude. The correction accounts for pressure drop off, like you would see with a blower. A turbo just spins faster, maintains boost, and only oxygen content falls off. But the correction adds for expected lacking oxygen at elevation and boost, even though boost didn't drop off. So it ends up over correcting. The number advertised then becomes much higher than it would actually be at sea level. This is why vendors don't want to "start, argue, or anything or down grade anything." Combine corrected numbers w telling people your competitor uses flipped ARH headers and you have a recipe for kit sales to folks who don't know any better.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> Just depends if you look any farther into the details than that. JPC uses a higher grade stainless, a ball bearing turbo, and a tubular core support. That kinda stuff adds up. And you don't know or tKe it into account it's going to look higher if you only look at numbers. But as Patrick already stated the fastest are twins. But because a single won't make 4000HP. I think JPC's is the fastest kit out there right now. With a damn stick at that lol</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yep, the setup supporting the turbo will be more important than how many you're running.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CPRsm, post: 13417350, member: 81705"] The correction factor is flawed at high altitude. The correction accounts for pressure drop off, like you would see with a blower. A turbo just spins faster, maintains boost, and only oxygen content falls off. But the correction adds for expected lacking oxygen at elevation and boost, even though boost didn't drop off. So it ends up over correcting. The number advertised then becomes much higher than it would actually be at sea level. This is why vendors don't want to "start, argue, or anything or down grade anything." Combine corrected numbers w telling people your competitor uses flipped ARH headers and you have a recipe for kit sales to folks who don't know any better. Just depends if you look any farther into the details than that. JPC uses a higher grade stainless, a ball bearing turbo, and a tubular core support. That kinda stuff adds up. And you don't know or tKe it into account it's going to look higher if you only look at numbers. But as Patrick already stated the fastest are twins. But because a single won't make 4000HP. I think JPC's is the fastest kit out there right now. With a damn stick at that lol Yep, the setup supporting the turbo will be more important than how many you're running. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
2011-2014 Mustangs
2011-2014 Mustang Talk
Twins vs single?
Top