Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
TVS 03 Cobra vs 2.9 Whipple 03 Cobra
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="intermatic" data-source="post: 14459092" data-attributes="member: 100111"><p>Not dodging anything. I do understand my numbers are lower than most with the 2.9. I'm not trying to get into a debate about it or take the "every dyno is different" route.</p><p>For what it's worth however (just for a comparison), before I had the 2.9, I ran an eaton/nitrous set up. The car was originally tuned at Fastlane (down in NC) on their dynojet and it put down 585 to the wheel. When I brought the car up to NY, I had it dyno'd at my current shop (mustang dyno) without having made any changes at all and it made 543.</p><p>I'd like to think that variance holds for my current numbers, which would put me in the 620s-630s range on a dynojet which is pretty consistent with what most people seem to make on pump gas on this forum.</p><p>High 600s on pump gas at your altitude is impressive to say the least. I can't say I've ever hard of anyone making that much with the 2.9 on pump gas. How much timing are these cars running typically and with what pulley? The stock exhaust manifolds are the choke point on my car at the moment and I think putting some long tubes on would knock my boost down and let me run a little more timing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="intermatic, post: 14459092, member: 100111"] Not dodging anything. I do understand my numbers are lower than most with the 2.9. I'm not trying to get into a debate about it or take the "every dyno is different" route. For what it's worth however (just for a comparison), before I had the 2.9, I ran an eaton/nitrous set up. The car was originally tuned at Fastlane (down in NC) on their dynojet and it put down 585 to the wheel. When I brought the car up to NY, I had it dyno'd at my current shop (mustang dyno) without having made any changes at all and it made 543. I'd like to think that variance holds for my current numbers, which would put me in the 620s-630s range on a dynojet which is pretty consistent with what most people seem to make on pump gas on this forum. High 600s on pump gas at your altitude is impressive to say the least. I can't say I've ever hard of anyone making that much with the 2.9 on pump gas. How much timing are these cars running typically and with what pulley? The stock exhaust manifolds are the choke point on my car at the moment and I think putting some long tubes on would knock my boost down and let me run a little more timing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
TVS 03 Cobra vs 2.9 Whipple 03 Cobra
Top