Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Mustang Forums
Fox Body Mustangs
Super Rare 1979 Cobra Vin#9F03F110024.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mustangmanjeff" data-source="post: 13574238" data-attributes="member: 29948"><p>agreed , but im not saying my car is gonna be worth a ton of money either like the guy claimed, but a 95 5.0 roller motor and sn95 is worth more then a 79 with a 5.0 carb motor and yeah they were rated 215hp @ the crank but they were all the same 225hp @ the crank they just lowered hp rateing because 235-245hp @ the crank in the 5.0 cobra motors would sound even less of a diff so make the cobra look better, even though its more then that they were more like 285hp @ the crank for the cobras and 230 @ the crank for my year 5.0. a 93-95 cobra dynos around 220-230rwhp, which isnt 235-245 crank hp and I dynoed my car stock with just catback exaust and it put down 201rwhp, deff not 215hp... esp when a catback doesnt do much power diff, my year 5.0 autos dyno around 170-180rwhp and 5 speeds are around 180-200rwhp, which is a far cry from the 140-200hp @ the crank the old 5.0 carb motor would dyno <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> and yeah my car is far from stock now... lol <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" />oke: so yes 160hp @ the crank WHOOOPIE! lol either way are 5.0 motors suck stock 200hp out of a 5.0 liter v8 <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mustangmanjeff, post: 13574238, member: 29948"] agreed , but im not saying my car is gonna be worth a ton of money either like the guy claimed, but a 95 5.0 roller motor and sn95 is worth more then a 79 with a 5.0 carb motor and yeah they were rated 215hp @ the crank but they were all the same 225hp @ the crank they just lowered hp rateing because 235-245hp @ the crank in the 5.0 cobra motors would sound even less of a diff so make the cobra look better, even though its more then that they were more like 285hp @ the crank for the cobras and 230 @ the crank for my year 5.0. a 93-95 cobra dynos around 220-230rwhp, which isnt 235-245 crank hp and I dynoed my car stock with just catback exaust and it put down 201rwhp, deff not 215hp... esp when a catback doesnt do much power diff, my year 5.0 autos dyno around 170-180rwhp and 5 speeds are around 180-200rwhp, which is a far cry from the 140-200hp @ the crank the old 5.0 carb motor would dyno ;) and yeah my car is far from stock now... lol :poke: so yes 160hp @ the crank WHOOOPIE! lol either way are 5.0 motors suck stock 200hp out of a 5.0 liter v8 :( [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Mustang Forums
Fox Body Mustangs
Super Rare 1979 Cobra Vin#9F03F110024.
Top