Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Storm Area 51, They Can't Stop All of Us Event
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="08mojo" data-source="post: 16250733" data-attributes="member: 132915"><p>I should let all of this go, but I could use some entertainment today.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>...and here we go...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's steel. </p><p></p><p>You said it yourself, there were a lot of other materials to feed the fire and keep it going--and they all got soaked in jet fuel. </p><p></p><p>The water supplied to the bathrooms and all of the fire sprinkler systems is not near enough to touch the fire in the building on that day. </p><p></p><p>I thought that would have been obvious by all of the camera coverage. It was pretty clear the fire was raging.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The heat wasn't trapped in the building? What? So you think it just magically disappeared to the atmosphere without causing any damage to the building? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Octane? Really?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Huh? The holes are key to the fire being so intense...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So, you do understand that oxygen is needed to sustain a fire, but for some reason you think the structure needs to be sealed to increase temperatures? Interesting...</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure, some of the heat would escape, but the source of the fire is still going to be stupid hot and the blown out windows are going to help feed the fire.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Let me get this straight: above you stated there were a lot of 'holes' in the building from the impact. Then, you think the impact 'melted' the steel shut? While at the same time, you don't think the temperatures were ever high enough to melt steel?</p><p></p><p>Regardless, the fire was being stoked by the 'holes.' There is a considerable amount of wind on the upper levels of a skyscraper. It was very apparent there were sustained winds that day from all of the video coverage.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You've got to be kidding? </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Look at this dummy, how is he ever going to cook those burgers without a lid? Hell, I don't even see any flames! Must be some sort of magic grill he's using... </p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]1587914[/ATTACH] </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You're apparently too dense to realize I was trying to convey the concept of heat transfer. There's also the concept of energy/mass balance, but that's going to be way too advanced.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Mechanical.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="08mojo, post: 16250733, member: 132915"] I should let all of this go, but I could use some entertainment today. ...and here we go... It's steel. You said it yourself, there were a lot of other materials to feed the fire and keep it going--and they all got soaked in jet fuel. The water supplied to the bathrooms and all of the fire sprinkler systems is not near enough to touch the fire in the building on that day. I thought that would have been obvious by all of the camera coverage. It was pretty clear the fire was raging. The heat wasn't trapped in the building? What? So you think it just magically disappeared to the atmosphere without causing any damage to the building? Octane? Really? Huh? The holes are key to the fire being so intense... So, you do understand that oxygen is needed to sustain a fire, but for some reason you think the structure needs to be sealed to increase temperatures? Interesting... Sure, some of the heat would escape, but the source of the fire is still going to be stupid hot and the blown out windows are going to help feed the fire. Let me get this straight: above you stated there were a lot of 'holes' in the building from the impact. Then, you think the impact 'melted' the steel shut? While at the same time, you don't think the temperatures were ever high enough to melt steel? Regardless, the fire was being stoked by the 'holes.' There is a considerable amount of wind on the upper levels of a skyscraper. It was very apparent there were sustained winds that day from all of the video coverage. You've got to be kidding? Look at this dummy, how is he ever going to cook those burgers without a lid? Hell, I don't even see any flames! Must be some sort of magic grill he's using... [ATTACH=full]1587914[/ATTACH] You're apparently too dense to realize I was trying to convey the concept of heat transfer. There's also the concept of energy/mass balance, but that's going to be way too advanced. Mechanical. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Storm Area 51, They Can't Stop All of Us Event
Top