Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Tailgate Party
SEC is the best, Clemson, USC, and OSU suck
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jpro" data-source="post: 15758358" data-attributes="member: 72690"><p>I think there were actually three teams (Bama, OSU, and USC).</p><p></p><p>The only issue I have is that it is stated by the committee that for a non-champ of a conference to get in, they must be unequivocally better than a conference champ. Hocutt said last week that the difference between #5 (Bama) and #8 (OSU) was "razor thin" (his words, not mine). Since that statement, OSU went and beat an undefeated, top 4 team and won their conference while Bama ate cookie dough on the couch. If it was razor thin last week, and with what OSU did over the weekend, how did Bama become unequivocally better? Sounds like collusion and very fishy to me. </p><p></p><p>We lost to Iowa by a stunning margin, there is no excuse for that. If you handed me our resume at the beginning of the year and said "Team A will have this resume to end the season, are they playoff-worthy?" I would say no. However, if you also handed me Bama's resume and said "Team B will have this resume to end the season, are they playoff-worthy?" I'd say hell no, not even close. </p><p></p><p>To each his own. We got in last year when we shouldn't have, but should have got in in 2015 and didn't. Mind boggling really, but this is the Bama Invitational. I want Mayfield to torch Bama then tell them to suck it. LOL</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jpro, post: 15758358, member: 72690"] I think there were actually three teams (Bama, OSU, and USC). The only issue I have is that it is stated by the committee that for a non-champ of a conference to get in, they must be unequivocally better than a conference champ. Hocutt said last week that the difference between #5 (Bama) and #8 (OSU) was "razor thin" (his words, not mine). Since that statement, OSU went and beat an undefeated, top 4 team and won their conference while Bama ate cookie dough on the couch. If it was razor thin last week, and with what OSU did over the weekend, how did Bama become unequivocally better? Sounds like collusion and very fishy to me. We lost to Iowa by a stunning margin, there is no excuse for that. If you handed me our resume at the beginning of the year and said "Team A will have this resume to end the season, are they playoff-worthy?" I would say no. However, if you also handed me Bama's resume and said "Team B will have this resume to end the season, are they playoff-worthy?" I'd say hell no, not even close. To each his own. We got in last year when we shouldn't have, but should have got in in 2015 and didn't. Mind boggling really, but this is the Bama Invitational. I want Mayfield to torch Bama then tell them to suck it. LOL [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Tailgate Party
SEC is the best, Clemson, USC, and OSU suck
Top