Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
Recording Traffic Stops?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="cohhbra" data-source="post: 11459891" data-attributes="member: 77954"><p>This wasn't at you, it was at the guy who said "drivel." And not I don't need to know a code to know laws. That officer broke the law of coming in my house without my permission or warrant, that's what he did. Cops don't like it when citizens such as myself know these types of things and take measures to say the right things and do the right things such as video recording. It holds you fully accountable. YOU KNOW that officer in my thread broke a law and if I had a video recording of it and an attorney a not guilty verdict would be brought down. For instance, little things like this: a local kid was in a closed park after hours with an illegal substance, cops rolls in searches the car (kid doesn't know his rights, idiot), finds substance. Our county only issues one kind of substance test kit or whatever and so it was not recorded which test was performed on the substance. In court, the kid's attorney pointed this out, technically the officer broke a code or something whatever, and therefore even thought the kid had the substance and admitted to it to the officer and everything, that one little technicality brought down the gavel "NOT GUILTY." These are the laws I'm talking about, the ones that are very easy for officers to forget or not realize they're breaking. Cops know crimes and how to stop crimes, but they don't know the little, codes as you stated, that cause the whole case to be a bust. </p><p></p><p>I'm tired of cops thinking they are the law, they are not, they are law enforcement. The "law" requires at least 8 years of schooling, passing the bar exam, and general upkeep on current laws to know and that's what attorneys are for, finding where you didn't EXACTLY coincide with the law just like officer "Bargin on in" did.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="cohhbra, post: 11459891, member: 77954"] This wasn't at you, it was at the guy who said "drivel." And not I don't need to know a code to know laws. That officer broke the law of coming in my house without my permission or warrant, that's what he did. Cops don't like it when citizens such as myself know these types of things and take measures to say the right things and do the right things such as video recording. It holds you fully accountable. YOU KNOW that officer in my thread broke a law and if I had a video recording of it and an attorney a not guilty verdict would be brought down. For instance, little things like this: a local kid was in a closed park after hours with an illegal substance, cops rolls in searches the car (kid doesn't know his rights, idiot), finds substance. Our county only issues one kind of substance test kit or whatever and so it was not recorded which test was performed on the substance. In court, the kid's attorney pointed this out, technically the officer broke a code or something whatever, and therefore even thought the kid had the substance and admitted to it to the officer and everything, that one little technicality brought down the gavel "NOT GUILTY." These are the laws I'm talking about, the ones that are very easy for officers to forget or not realize they're breaking. Cops know crimes and how to stop crimes, but they don't know the little, codes as you stated, that cause the whole case to be a bust. I'm tired of cops thinking they are the law, they are not, they are law enforcement. The "law" requires at least 8 years of schooling, passing the bar exam, and general upkeep on current laws to know and that's what attorneys are for, finding where you didn't EXACTLY coincide with the law just like officer "Bargin on in" did. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Donut Shop
Recording Traffic Stops?
Top