Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
Procharged 5.0 vs Bolt on/E85 M3
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DarkMach1" data-source="post: 16211957" data-attributes="member: 84080"><p>Thanks, Old timer.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I hear you. Its my understanding that those cars with his mods put down 580-600whp and 650 or so torque. He said on the dyno he was on it put down 560whp and 600+ torque. So yes I agree a bolt on mustang would have nothing for that being 130whp and like 250wtq behind.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DarkMach1, post: 16211957, member: 84080"] Thanks, Old timer. I hear you. Its my understanding that those cars with his mods put down 580-600whp and 650 or so torque. He said on the dyno he was on it put down 560whp and 600+ torque. So yes I agree a bolt on mustang would have nothing for that being 130whp and like 250wtq behind. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
Procharged 5.0 vs Bolt on/E85 M3
Top