Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Tailgate Party
Official 2023 College Football Season thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="VegasMichael" data-source="post: 16996594" data-attributes="member: 105950"><p>My argument is that some players on the team do more work than others because they are starters whereas many on the team see very little time and are on the sidelines. Some argue that a free education is stipend enough. I used to be in that mindset but have backed off on that. I also feel for the walk-ons or partial scholarship guys who have to shell out money for tuition/room/board but not everyone can be as good as others and it's a tough pill to swallow but it's life.</p><p></p><p>I'm also not one who thinks NIL should be equitable and that everyone gets a trophy and a lollypop. There's a lot more pressure on starters than on on-starters. At the same time, some players are going to be more marketable than others not only due to their playing time but also their ability to market themselves because they might be very personable and just flat out better than almost everyone else. </p><p></p><p>It's not fair that quarterbacks and running backs and wide receivers get all the attention and most of the attention/money but they are, more times than not, the star attraction.</p><p></p><p>There's no perfect system for this, I'm afraid.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="VegasMichael, post: 16996594, member: 105950"] My argument is that some players on the team do more work than others because they are starters whereas many on the team see very little time and are on the sidelines. Some argue that a free education is stipend enough. I used to be in that mindset but have backed off on that. I also feel for the walk-ons or partial scholarship guys who have to shell out money for tuition/room/board but not everyone can be as good as others and it's a tough pill to swallow but it's life. I'm also not one who thinks NIL should be equitable and that everyone gets a trophy and a lollypop. There's a lot more pressure on starters than on on-starters. At the same time, some players are going to be more marketable than others not only due to their playing time but also their ability to market themselves because they might be very personable and just flat out better than almost everyone else. It's not fair that quarterbacks and running backs and wide receivers get all the attention and most of the attention/money but they are, more times than not, the star attraction. There's no perfect system for this, I'm afraid. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Tailgate Party
Official 2023 College Football Season thread
Top