Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
NWS Pics that make you :lol: every time you see them NWS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="svtfocus2cobra" data-source="post: 16131496" data-attributes="member: 21786"><p>Yes they were, but they were involved with the landing at Normandy. The Army was nowhere near as versed on amphibious landings as the Marines are, hence why the Marines helped advise and were considered to be deployed during the landing. The Marine Corps was small then but they still could have deployed a contingency of Marines during that fight.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="svtfocus2cobra, post: 16131496, member: 21786"] Yes they were, but they were involved with the landing at Normandy. The Army was nowhere near as versed on amphibious landings as the Marines are, hence why the Marines helped advise and were considered to be deployed during the landing. The Marine Corps was small then but they still could have deployed a contingency of Marines during that fight. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
NWS Pics that make you :lol: every time you see them NWS
Top