Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
NWS Pics that make you :lol: every time you see them NWS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CFRacer22" data-source="post: 11312656" data-attributes="member: 51790"><p>Are you serious? Good job making of ass of yourself by not understand a simple chart, go back to 5th grade. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" />oke:</p><p></p><p>The figure is quoting the reason (CAUSE) for spending the money, which is how many citizens have died due to terrorist attacks...dying soldiers are not the CAUSE for spending the money, they're an EFFECT of spending the money on war</p><p></p><p>5 million people die of cancer - CAUSED by cancer - spend 50 million to try to SOLVE problem - research</p><p></p><p>3000 people die of terrorism - CAUSED by terrorist attacks - spend 1.26 trillion to try to SOLVE problem - war</p><p></p><p>if you want to consider the soldier's lives lost due to the war that would be an added cost to the 1.26 trillion, making the ratio even worse.</p><p></p><p>I'm conservative, and not saying I am for or against the war, just trying to make you have a clear understand of the chart. Not sure why I even both though because you probably won't understand this post either.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CFRacer22, post: 11312656, member: 51790"] Are you serious? Good job making of ass of yourself by not understand a simple chart, go back to 5th grade. :poke: The figure is quoting the reason (CAUSE) for spending the money, which is how many citizens have died due to terrorist attacks...dying soldiers are not the CAUSE for spending the money, they're an EFFECT of spending the money on war 5 million people die of cancer - CAUSED by cancer - spend 50 million to try to SOLVE problem - research 3000 people die of terrorism - CAUSED by terrorist attacks - spend 1.26 trillion to try to SOLVE problem - war if you want to consider the soldier's lives lost due to the war that would be an added cost to the 1.26 trillion, making the ratio even worse. I'm conservative, and not saying I am for or against the war, just trying to make you have a clear understand of the chart. Not sure why I even both though because you probably won't understand this post either. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
NWS Pics that make you :lol: every time you see them NWS
Top