Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
NWS Pics that make you :lol: every time you see them NWS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="UnleashedBeast" data-source="post: 11052296" data-attributes="member: 112023"><p>What if the woman who grossed $60,000 annually only had to pay the same 17.7% as the top 1%. Then she would only have to pay a little over $10,000 in taxes. Don't you realize how much better her life could be with an extra $8,000 extra at her disposal yearly? Don't you understand that THIS is what actually boost the economy? The top 1% do not boost the economy, if people can't afford to buy...it's a stalemate. We should have to pay the same percent of taxes straight across the board no matter what your gross income level is.</p><p></p><p>The next point I want to make is this....</p><p></p><p>He could have paid 30% (13.6 million) and still had over 30 million to do what he pleases with it. The scales are unbalanced and in the advantage of the wealthy. Of course it is, the wealthy (top 1%) are the ones who elect presidents and pay lobbyist to win the vote of select politicians when laws and bills come to pass.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="UnleashedBeast, post: 11052296, member: 112023"] What if the woman who grossed $60,000 annually only had to pay the same 17.7% as the top 1%. Then she would only have to pay a little over $10,000 in taxes. Don't you realize how much better her life could be with an extra $8,000 extra at her disposal yearly? Don't you understand that THIS is what actually boost the economy? The top 1% do not boost the economy, if people can't afford to buy...it's a stalemate. We should have to pay the same percent of taxes straight across the board no matter what your gross income level is. The next point I want to make is this.... He could have paid 30% (13.6 million) and still had over 30 million to do what he pleases with it. The scales are unbalanced and in the advantage of the wealthy. Of course it is, the wealthy (top 1%) are the ones who elect presidents and pay lobbyist to win the vote of select politicians when laws and bills come to pass. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Pics and Videos Buffet
NWS Pics that make you :lol: every time you see them NWS
Top