Numbers?
- Thread starter ON D BIT
- Start date
Looks like 9 seconds to go from 160-170...
7.9 60-130 stock....where does that lie with today’s mag tested stock power numbers?
I’m guessing 4025 is the track pack with cf wheels....100lbs more for the non track?
Seems reasonable
Like someone else already noted. These test sheets sure do look like someone filled in the data using a mouse.
Haha. I totally see that. Or even writing it in directly with a ipen onto the screen of an iPad.
I've seen better penmanship from toddlers.
Sent from my [mind] using the svtperformance.com mobile app
horrible. 7.9 is like high 4xx HP, if i recall correctly. a 130mph car should be mid-high 6s
but again, both of those are fake, and that IG account is cancerous. look at their old posts, everything they said is 100% incorrect, which is why they have 1xx followers instead of 100k
Delete thread sorry for the misrepresentation. Haha
I'll be the oddball here and say that it's "possible" it could be real. I'm not saying it is but I do believe it's a possibility. I'm basing it on other sheets like this published from car and driver where it looks like a 4yr old wrote on it.
The 7.9 secs it take from 60-130 is very believeable. Look at tests from the c7z06 .It takes 9.1 seconds from 60-130. (0-60 in 3.3secs/ 0-130 in 12.4 secs). As someone stated above, I've seen 60-130 tests for a c7zr1 that shows 6.9/7.0 and like 7.1 while the gt500 is 7.9. We're not talking about 0-160. A 60 roll is a high mph to start at and a lot comes into play as far as accelerating such as what rpm a car is at at 60mph. It could be at a very low rpm and gunning it from 60mph won't result in a fast 60-130 time so a 7.9 is very believeable.
Horsepower doesn't mean anything. Its very possible it could take 9secs from 160-170. Aerodynamics is key here. If this was with the track package, it's very believeable as that spoiler drastically hinders top speed acceleration just like it does on the c7z06. Hmm is that why Ford top speed is limited to only 180? Cause it possiblity falls on its face up top?
It's actually the same as comparing a c6z06 to a c7z06. Even though the c7z06 track pack has 150 more hp and 180 more TQ/ it actually has a lower top speed and than a c6z06 (505hp/470tq) and if I can remember correctly (I'll have to look to verify) the 60-130 was pretty much the same but the c6z06 was faster after that 130mph and higher while also achieving a much higher top speed. It's more to a car than just hp/tq numbers.
Like I said im not saying this is real or fake but i believe it's a possibility it could be real but we shall see.
The 7.9 secs it take from 60-130 is very believeable. Look at tests from the c7z06 .It takes 9.1 seconds from 60-130. (0-60 in 3.3secs/ 0-130 in 12.4 secs). As someone stated above, I've seen 60-130 tests for a c7zr1 that shows 6.9/7.0 and like 7.1 while the gt500 is 7.9. We're not talking about 0-160. A 60 roll is a high mph to start at and a lot comes into play as far as accelerating such as what rpm a car is at at 60mph. It could be at a very low rpm and gunning it from 60mph won't result in a fast 60-130 time so a 7.9 is very believeable.
Horsepower doesn't mean anything. Its very possible it could take 9secs from 160-170. Aerodynamics is key here. If this was with the track package, it's very believeable as that spoiler drastically hinders top speed acceleration just like it does on the c7z06. Hmm is that why Ford top speed is limited to only 180? Cause it possiblity falls on its face up top?
It's actually the same as comparing a c6z06 to a c7z06. Even though the c7z06 track pack has 150 more hp and 180 more TQ/ it actually has a lower top speed and than a c6z06 (505hp/470tq) and if I can remember correctly (I'll have to look to verify) the 60-130 was pretty much the same but the c6z06 was faster after that 130mph and higher while also achieving a much higher top speed. It's more to a car than just hp/tq numbers.
Like I said im not saying this is real or fake but i believe it's a possibility it could be real but we shall see.
When they do that 60-130mph run they are starting in a gear that is the best gear to accelerate from @ 60mph correct?
There is also another test where they do 30-50mph accel. and 50-70mph accel. in top gear. Manual cars suck at that cause they don't d/shift, auto cars automatically d/shift and they always get wicked 30-50 and 50-70 accel. times.
Tony
There is also another test where they do 30-50mph accel. and 50-70mph accel. in top gear. Manual cars suck at that cause they don't d/shift, auto cars automatically d/shift and they always get wicked 30-50 and 50-70 accel. times.
Tony
60-130 in 6.9 is zr1?
To brag, shamelessly, I’ve done 60-130 in under 4.5 seconds on high boost. I would like every internet point. Thank you. That’s on 20psi and 1070whp with a built t56. I’m going 6r80 and excited to see what happens. I have a sub 1 second video of 80-105. Would post it if I wasn’t tech illiterate and lazy. I think I could break 4.0 seconds with an auto and some improvements. I’d like to get my car comfortably in the mid 8’s at 160+ in relatively Street guise clicking off a 1.40-1.45 60ft. High 9’s with wheel spin currently.
Back to beating up on bogus gt500 test data, there’s no way the track pack car comes in at 4025lbs. I’m betting 4150+.
Also, a 129ft best stop 70-0 is so unbelievably good, that a McLaren can’t do it on track tires unless the track is perfect, tires are perfectly broke in and healthy etc. a 4563 mike gt500 ain’t doing that kind of stopping on a street tire with 60+ treadwear. Lowest would be 140ft imo. That’s 8.5 car lengths from 70mph. 7.5 car lengths ain’t happening.
To brag, shamelessly, I’ve done 60-130 in under 4.5 seconds on high boost. I would like every internet point. Thank you. That’s on 20psi and 1070whp with a built t56. I’m going 6r80 and excited to see what happens. I have a sub 1 second video of 80-105. Would post it if I wasn’t tech illiterate and lazy. I think I could break 4.0 seconds with an auto and some improvements. I’d like to get my car comfortably in the mid 8’s at 160+ in relatively Street guise clicking off a 1.40-1.45 60ft. High 9’s with wheel spin currently.
Back to beating up on bogus gt500 test data, there’s no way the track pack car comes in at 4025lbs. I’m betting 4150+.
Also, a 129ft best stop 70-0 is so unbelievably good, that a McLaren can’t do it on track tires unless the track is perfect, tires are perfectly broke in and healthy etc. a 4563 mike gt500 ain’t doing that kind of stopping on a street tire with 60+ treadwear. Lowest would be 140ft imo. That’s 8.5 car lengths from 70mph. 7.5 car lengths ain’t happening.
Last edited:
Viper acr was like 135ft 70-0, and McLaren 720s is like 131ft 70-0.
129ft on a lesser tire with less downforce and weigh more weight ain’t happening.
129ft on a lesser tire with less downforce and weigh more weight ain’t happening.
Lol, I was about to call BS on your 60-130 until you clarified the setup.
I am not bragging, but when it comes to roll races or 60-130times, I could easily be this, and am on many other forums, a resident expert on the matter.
The ONLY way a 7.9 60-130 is doable in a 2020 GT500, is if they started AT 60mph and punched it.
60-130 is 80%HP, 10% traction 10% shifting.
I'll bet another $100 a stock GT500 will click at least high 6.x 60-130 on a vbox or dragy
Thanks, car made 1208whp on 30psi and weighs sub 3400lbs, but I can barely hook 1070whp at 70-80 almost wot in 3rd. I don’t think Ive tried 30psi on the street.
30-100 brake boosting in 2nd and just wotshifting for 3rd is very good on pump gas/800whp. Great bite and go. Ive pulled on bikes and tesla’s with that roll off. Glowing brakes and all haha. I need to get some tech in my car.
Are you using a vbox or dragy. Id suggest getting the dragy over vbox now. much more user friendly, allows for video, and an leaderboard on the app.
Users who are viewing this thread
