Home
What's new
Latest activity
Authors
Store
Latest reviews
Search products
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New listings
New products
New profile posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
Cart
Cart
Loading…
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Change style
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Notre Dame cathedral on fire
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Klay" data-source="post: 16177769" data-attributes="member: 45120"><p>For one, I never claimed it only was an accident and nothing else. I honestly dont know. There is a difference though in presuming it was arson/terrorism and presuming muslims did it.</p><p>That is the same logic that race baiters use. They presume all negative police interaction with people of color must be racist in nature.</p><p>So excuse if I dont automatically assume anything negative that happens must be because of muslims.</p><p></p><p>Plus, the investigators should go into it without any preconceived notions. Why should they presume it was criminal in nature? They should just go in and look for evidence. If it points to arson, pursue that path. If it points to an accident, then pursue that instead. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not sure how that is relevant? I have never claimed the Muslim faith is peaceful. I'm sure there are plenty of muslims who dont know what it says, thus wouldnt harm others. I think the Muslim faith is terrible but I refuse to assume all people in a specific group must be horrible and responsible for everything bad in the world.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Klay, post: 16177769, member: 45120"] For one, I never claimed it only was an accident and nothing else. I honestly dont know. There is a difference though in presuming it was arson/terrorism and presuming muslims did it. That is the same logic that race baiters use. They presume all negative police interaction with people of color must be racist in nature. So excuse if I dont automatically assume anything negative that happens must be because of muslims. Plus, the investigators should go into it without any preconceived notions. Why should they presume it was criminal in nature? They should just go in and look for evidence. If it points to arson, pursue that path. If it points to an accident, then pursue that instead. Not sure how that is relevant? I have never claimed the Muslim faith is peaceful. I'm sure there are plenty of muslims who dont know what it says, thus wouldnt harm others. I think the Muslim faith is terrible but I refuse to assume all people in a specific group must be horrible and responsible for everything bad in the world. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
SVTPerformance's Chain of Restaurants
Road Side Pub
Notre Dame cathedral on fire
Top